2014
DOI: 10.1080/00949655.2014.970553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A control chart using an auxiliary variable and repetitive sampling for monitoring process mean

Abstract: In this paper, a new control chart is proposed by using an auxiliary variable and repetitive sampling in order to enhance the performance of detecting a shift in process mean. The product-difference type estimator of the mean is plotted on the proposed control chart, which utilizes the information of an auxiliary variable correlated with the main quality variable. The proposed control chart is based on the outer and inner control limits so that repetitive sampling is allowed when the plotted statistic falls be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of the proposed CUSUM charts is compared with that of some existing control charts such as the CUSUM chart introduced by Roberts [3], Mean-FIR control chart suggested by Lucas and Crosier [36], robust CUSUM charts based on median, Mid-Range (MR), and Hodges-Lehmann (HL) and Tri-Mean (TM) suggested by Nazir et al [37]. Moreover, the per-formance of the proposed charts is also evaluated in comparison to the auxiliary information based M-type control chart introduced by Riaz [21], the modi cation of M-type charts by using repetitive sampling proposed by Lee et al [20], and the combined Shewhart CUSUM (CSC) charts suggested by Sanusi et al [28]. When n = 5, k = 0:5, xy = 0:75, and ARL 0 = 370, the proposed auxiliary information based CUSUM control charts using E 1 , E 2 , and E 3 considerably outperform the existing CSC control charts for small to Table 10.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Proposed And Existing Control Chartsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The performance of the proposed CUSUM charts is compared with that of some existing control charts such as the CUSUM chart introduced by Roberts [3], Mean-FIR control chart suggested by Lucas and Crosier [36], robust CUSUM charts based on median, Mid-Range (MR), and Hodges-Lehmann (HL) and Tri-Mean (TM) suggested by Nazir et al [37]. Moreover, the per-formance of the proposed charts is also evaluated in comparison to the auxiliary information based M-type control chart introduced by Riaz [21], the modi cation of M-type charts by using repetitive sampling proposed by Lee et al [20], and the combined Shewhart CUSUM (CSC) charts suggested by Sanusi et al [28]. When n = 5, k = 0:5, xy = 0:75, and ARL 0 = 370, the proposed auxiliary information based CUSUM control charts using E 1 , E 2 , and E 3 considerably outperform the existing CSC control charts for small to Table 10.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Proposed And Existing Control Chartsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar comparison can be made for various combinations of n, k, and xy . A comparison between the proposed CUSUM charts and M-Type control charts of Riaz [21] and Lee et al [20] is made for n = 20 and xy = 0:50 at ARL 0 = 220. Riaz [21] did not report the ARL performance of his chart; however, Lee et al [20] provided the ARL comparison between their chart and that of Riaz [21].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Proposed And Existing Control Chartsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is complicated to derive the distribution of C w , i , so, we will develop a Monte Carlo simulation algorithm to find the average run lengths of the proposed control chart by following Lee et al. This algorithm is stated as follows: Computation of the proposed EWMA–CUSUM statistic.…”
Section: Proposed Control Chartmentioning
confidence: 99%