2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10665-013-9672-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A control volume finite element method for adaptive mesh simulation of flow in heap leaching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For more details regarding the applied numerical method, refer to Mostaghimi et al (2014) and Jackson et al (2015).…”
Section: Cvfe Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For more details regarding the applied numerical method, refer to Mostaghimi et al (2014) and Jackson et al (2015).…”
Section: Cvfe Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adaptive mesh required only 234 seconds, which is much lower than that required by the high resolution model whilst offering similar accuracy. Mostaghimi et al (2015) has provided further more test cases for validation of the developed CVFE method and Mostaghimi et al (2014) demonstrated that the static mesh CVFE discretization has a linear order of convergence.…”
Section: Stable Displacementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study by Mostaghimi et al (2014), the method was verified against the one-dimensional Buckley-Leverett problem and showed approximately a first order of convergence. The first test case, presented here, considers a two-dimensional Buckley-Leverett problem where the advantages of dynamic mesh adaptivity are highlighted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In addition, the mesh adaptivity resolves the flow features accurately by improving the mesh resolution in the zones of dynamic interest. Mostaghimi et al (2014) showed that the overhead in the computational time of simulation using mesh adaptivity is approximately 5 % of the total CPU time while the accuracy of the solution is considerably improved. It was also demonstrated that to achieve the same accuracy, a static mesh method requires 46 times more computational time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technologies have enabled more complex multi-phase transport in the modelling of the heap leaching process [17][18][19][20][21][22] with much of this work focusing on capturing the kinetics in one-dimensional columns or two-dimensional slices. Mostaghimi et al [23,24] applied CFD technology to capturing flow in a three-dimensional heap. McBride et al [25][26][27] coupled flow-solid-gas and chemical interactions within a CFD model and applied the model to a three-dimensional heterogeneous heap with variable permeability, saturated conditions and solution traveling through preferential pathways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%