2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7ra07753j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A controllable mechanistic transition of charge transfer in helical peptides: from hopping to superexchange

Abstract: A controllable mechanistic transition of charge transfer in helical peptides is demonstrated as a direct result of side-bridge gating.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The others are two-step sequential hopping pathways originating at Aib1, passing through either the peptide backbone (Aib4, red arrows) or the amide-containing side bridge/side chain (blue arrows), and terminating at Aib6. 26 The overall computed superexchange rate constant (k ET,super ) is 2.28 × 10 11 s −1 for constrained 9, while the overall hopping electron transfer rate constant via its backbone is smaller (k ET,hop1 = 2.36 × 10 9 s −1 ). In contrast, linear 10 has an overall k ET,super of 6.57 × 10 12 s −1 , while the overall k ET,hop1 via the backbone is greater (1.00 × 10 15 s −1 ).…”
Section: Accounts Of Chemical Researchmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The others are two-step sequential hopping pathways originating at Aib1, passing through either the peptide backbone (Aib4, red arrows) or the amide-containing side bridge/side chain (blue arrows), and terminating at Aib6. 26 The overall computed superexchange rate constant (k ET,super ) is 2.28 × 10 11 s −1 for constrained 9, while the overall hopping electron transfer rate constant via its backbone is smaller (k ET,hop1 = 2.36 × 10 9 s −1 ). In contrast, linear 10 has an overall k ET,super of 6.57 × 10 12 s −1 , while the overall k ET,hop1 via the backbone is greater (1.00 × 10 15 s −1 ).…”
Section: Accounts Of Chemical Researchmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…One involves one-step superexchange between the first and last residues (Aib1 and Aib6), as shown by the green arrows. The others are two-step sequential hopping pathways originating at Aib1, passing through either the peptide backbone (Aib4, red arrows) or the amide-containing side bridge/side chain (blue arrows), and terminating at Aib6 …”
Section: Backbone Rigidity and Controllable Mechanistic Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, the efficiency of ETp in peptides is enhanced by helical secondary structure, which is in turn defined by temperature . The inclusion of amino acids with electron-rich side chains facilitates ET across a peptide, while a side chain constraint or tether, which rigidifies the backbone dramatically, decreases ET in solution. , These two main experimental techniques, namely, solution-based electrochemistry (ET) and solid-state junction conductance (ETp), are widely employed to investigate charge transfer across self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of peptides. , Specifically, the electrical current across solid-state molecular junctions can be investigated as a function of applied voltage, using SAM-based peptide ensembles sandwiched between two metallic electrodes . ET through such a peptide monolayer can be studied in solution by replacing one electrode of the molecular junction with a redox-active moiety to provide the electron transfer rate constant ( k et ). ,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%