A controller-based architecture for information centric network construction and topology management

Zali, Zeinab; Hashemi, Massoud Reza; Cianci, Ilaria; Grieco, Alfredo; Boggia, Gennaro

doi:10.1109/cc.2018.8424609

Cited by 11 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…If network topology is maintained unchanged, it is possible to formulate an optimization task for system transmission capacity and line transmission capacity [12,13].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Engineering Practices of Determining Transmission Capacity and Delay of Interconnecting Line Taking into Account its Configuration and Cost

Parkhomey

Boiko

Tsopa

et al. 2020

IJEEI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article contains information on engineering practice of determining transmission capacity of computer network line. The article presents a variant of engineering synthesis of computer network, which is a combined process of mathematical and heuristic methods combining. The engineering synthesis is offered as vector and global, because it must result in network development, optimal in terms of its practical use. All the significant network quality indicators, including economic and practical, are taken into consideration. In case of engineering synthesis, it is not possible that only one quality indicator is significant: there are always at least two significant indicatorsa cost and an indicator that characterizes the main effect that is achieved in case of network use (efficacy). If at least one of the quality indicators significant for practical use is not taken into account, such network cannot be considered optimal. Computer network synthesis usually consists of structure synthesis, parameters optimization and discrete network selection. If network topology is maintained unchanged, it is possible to formulate an optimization task for line transmission capacity. The solution of transmission capacity task, which is constantly changing, may be chosen as a starting point for the selection of discrete indicator of transmission capacity.

show abstract

“…If network topology is maintained unchanged, it is possible to formulate an optimization task for system transmission capacity and line transmission capacity [12,13].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Engineering Practices of Determining Transmission Capacity and Delay of Interconnecting Line Taking into Account its Configuration and Cost

Parkhomey

Boiko

Tsopa

et al. 2020

IJEEI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this case, the users frequently request services, and the model can reduce the burden of the upper network. Similarly, the paper [117] introduced a centralized controller for constructing and managing the ICN overlay, which achieved high performances in routing, caching, mobility, and security. Sun et al [118] applied CCN to SDN and proposed multi-protocol routers.…”

Section: Icn Over Sdnmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…-A centralized controller for constructing and managing the ICN overlay [117]. -A SDN-ICN communication architecture for smart grids to improve QoS [122].…”

Section: Routingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Survey on the scheme evaluation, opportunities and challenges of software defined‐information centric network

Ai,

Zhang,

Zhang

et al. 2023

IET Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As a promising architecture of next‐generation network, software defined‐information centric network (SD‐ICN) inherits the advantages of software defined network (SDN) and information‐centric network (ICN) to enable flexible and fast content retrieval, especially in the current era of artificial intelligence. However, the existing researches mainly focus on a single respective in this field, which motivates in comprehensively providing a forward‐looking guidance and development direction for scholars and engineers. To this end, the latest developments of SD‐ICN is presented. First, the widely‐accepted concepts and impacts on traditional networks are introduced. Second, the shortcomings of SDN and ICN over conventional networks are respectively analyzed to illustrate the necessity of SD‐ICN. Third, based on extensive analysis and deep deliberation, a methodical taxonomy for existing combination studies is proposed. They are divided into SDN over ICN, ICN over SDN, and mutual immersive pattern. Fourth, the performances of three integration categories are compared and the limitations of related works are highlighted. Fifth, the maturity index from six development indicators are evaluated. Further, the maturity and practicality of these schemes are generalized. Based on the above studies and comparisons, the lessons learned by SDN and ICN developments are concluded. Finally, future research directions and opportunities are discussed for the readers.

show abstract

“…The authors in [80] and [81] used an SDN to construct and manage the topology of an information centric network (ICN) overlaid on a legacy IP network using the controller's management capabilities. A centralized controller would construct the ICN topology dynamically when new customer networks would join the overlay, and the controller was capable of modifying the topology of the ICN overlay in order to reduce the load on the congested links.…”

Section: Approach #3: Sdn-based Locationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Location Management in Internet Protocol-Based Future LEO Satellite Networks: A Review

Darwish

Kurt

Yanıkömeroğlu

et al. 2022

IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Future integrated terrestrial, aerial, and space networks will involve thousands of low-Earth-orbit (LEO) satellites, which will form a network of mega-constellations. These megaconstellations will play a significant role in providing communication and Internet services anywhere, at any time, and for everything. Due to the large scale and highly dynamic nature of future LEO satellite networks (SatNets), their management will be a complicated process, especially the aspect of mobility management and its two components: location management and handover management. In this article, we present a comprehensive and critical review of the state-of-the-art research in location management for LEO SatNets. First, we give an overview of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) mobility management standards (e.g., Mobile IPv6 and Proxy Mobile IPv6) and discuss the limitations of their location management techniques for future LEO SatNets. We highlight the mobility characteristics of future LEO SatNets and their challenging features, and we describe two unprecedented future location management scenarios. A taxonomy of existing location management solutions for LEO SatNets is also presented with solutions classified according to three approaches. The "Issues to consider" section draws attention to critical points related to each of the reviewed approaches that should be considered in future LEO SatNets location management. To identify the research gaps, the current state of LEO SatNets location management is summarized. Noteworthy future research directions are recommended. The article provides a road map for researchers and industry to shape the future of location management for LEO SatNets.

show abstract

A controller-based architecture for information centric network construction and topology management

Cited by 11 publications

References 10 publications

Engineering Practices of Determining Transmission Capacity and Delay of Interconnecting Line Taking into Account its Configuration and Cost

Engineering Practices of Determining Transmission Capacity and Delay of Interconnecting Line Taking into Account its Configuration and Cost

Survey on the scheme evaluation, opportunities and challenges of software defined‐information centric network

Location Management in Internet Protocol-Based Future LEO Satellite Networks: A Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About