2009
DOI: 10.1216/rmj-2009-39-2-423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Converse Theorem for Hilbert-Jacobi Forms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The converse theorem for GL(n) automorphic representations is a great achievement of several authors: H. Jacquet and R. Langlands [9] when n = 2, H. Jacquet, I. Piatetski-Shapiro and J. Shalika [10] if n = 3, J. Cogdell and I. Piatetski-Shapiro [3] for general n. The first named author found in [13] the analogue of the classical Hecke converse theorem for Jacobi cusp forms. The same result for Hilbert-Jacobi forms was established by K. Bringmann and S. Hayashida [2].…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The converse theorem for GL(n) automorphic representations is a great achievement of several authors: H. Jacquet and R. Langlands [9] when n = 2, H. Jacquet, I. Piatetski-Shapiro and J. Shalika [10] if n = 3, J. Cogdell and I. Piatetski-Shapiro [3] for general n. The first named author found in [13] the analogue of the classical Hecke converse theorem for Jacobi cusp forms. The same result for Hilbert-Jacobi forms was established by K. Bringmann and S. Hayashida [2].…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…μ≡0 (2) f μ (4mτ ) and F 2m (τ ) − F m (τ ) = 2m μ=1 μ≡1 (2) f μ (4mτ ) are cusp forms of weight k − 1 2 and character γ = * *…”
Section: Theorem 1 Letmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations