2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv1984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A coronagraphic absorbing cloud reveals the narrow-line region and extended Lyman α emission of QSO J0823+0529

Abstract: We report long-slit spectroscopic observations of the quasar SDSS J082303.22+052907.6 (z CIV ∼3.1875), whose Broad Line Region (BLR) is partly eclipsed by a strong damped Lyman-α (DLA; logN (HI)=21.7) cloud. This allows us to study the Narrow Line Region (NLR) of the quasar and the Lyman-α emission from the host galaxy. Using cloudy models that explain the presence of strong NV and PV absorption together with the detection of SiII * and OI * * absorption in the DLA, we show that the density and the distance of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To start with, we note that the size and surface brightness of the Lyα emission seen are both less than what is typically seen in the case of radio-loud QSOs at similar redshifts (see for example, Roche et al 2014).This suggests that the origin of Lyα emission in the present case may be very different from the extended Lyα seen around radio galaxies. We also note that, based on the surface brightness of the Lyα emission, lack of N V absorption and fine-structure lines of Si II, this DLA is not similar to the one studied by Fathivavsari et al (2015), where the DLA is thought to be dense, compact and close to the QSO covering the broad as well as narrow emission line region only partially (see also , Finley et al 2013). Therefore, it is most likely that we are not seeing the extended NLR of the host galaxy.…”
Section: Fluorescent Lyα Emission Induced By the Quasarcontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…To start with, we note that the size and surface brightness of the Lyα emission seen are both less than what is typically seen in the case of radio-loud QSOs at similar redshifts (see for example, Roche et al 2014).This suggests that the origin of Lyα emission in the present case may be very different from the extended Lyα seen around radio galaxies. We also note that, based on the surface brightness of the Lyα emission, lack of N V absorption and fine-structure lines of Si II, this DLA is not similar to the one studied by Fathivavsari et al (2015), where the DLA is thought to be dense, compact and close to the QSO covering the broad as well as narrow emission line region only partially (see also , Finley et al 2013). Therefore, it is most likely that we are not seeing the extended NLR of the host galaxy.…”
Section: Fluorescent Lyα Emission Induced By the Quasarcontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Interestingly, this ghostly DLA has characteristics similar to those of the 'eclipsing' DLA found along the line of sight to the quasar J0823+0529 (Fathivavsari et al 2015). Both DLAs have very small sizes and are located close to the central AGN.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…This result seems to be in stark contrast with previous narrow-band and spectroscopic surveys for bright radio-quiet quasars at highredshift. These studies have found detection rates of giant nebula less than 10% using NB imaging at < < z 2 3 (Cantalupo et al 2014;Martin et al 2014;Hennawi et al 2015;Arrigoni Battaia et al 2016), while spectroscopic surveys at any redshift have found exclusively smaller nebulae (<60 pkpc) and only in about 50% of the cases (North et al 2012;Fathivavsari et al 2015). Because all these surveys-including our MUSE observations-reached a similar depth, the origin of this discrepancy must be searched for somewhere else.…”
Section: Why Such a High Detection Ratementioning
confidence: 72%
“…There are only a few cases in which the nebulae are symmetric enough to expect a detection over scales extending to 100 pkpc (e.g., #5);however, the difficulty of estimating the exact PSF of the quasar through slit spectroscopy may result in a substantial reduction of the detection rate. This effect may also reduce the detectability of the inner parts of the nebulae to the level found by spectroscopic surveys (North et al 2012;Fathivavsari et al 2015). Moreover, the availability of more spatial positions and the large FoV provided by MUSE with respect to a single slit will clearly facilitate the extraction and detection of extended emission around the quasars.…”
Section: Why Such a High Detection Ratementioning
confidence: 99%