Laurence Labrune (2012). The phonology of Japanese. (The Phonology of the World's Languages.) Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. xiv+296.
Shigeto KawaharaRutgers University
General assessment and summaryThe phonology of Japanese addresses many aspects of Japanese phonology, and its coverage is rather comprehensive. The book assumes basic familiarity with generative phonology, but is written in an accessible way. The book is a welcome contribution to the field, since, as the author mentions (pp. 6-7), there is no recent reference book for Japanese phonology (the classic reference on this topic, Vance 1987, is now out of print ; a more recent book, Vance 2008, focuses more on phonetics, primarily designed for English-speaking L2 learners of Japanese). 1 The book will be a very useful reference for anybody who is interested in Japanese phonology, especially for non-experts and non-native speakers of Japanese.One aim of this book is to synthesise the theoretical linguistics approach with traditional grammar, known as kokugogaku. The latter approach is descriptively oriented and has continued to reveal a rich set of data, and as such is of great potential interest to theoretical linguists. However, papers in this tradition are usually written in Japanese and are not widely circulated outside of Japan, and hence are accessible to a small subset of theoretical linguists. The book thus achieves the goal of making this rich source of data available to theoretical linguists. In this connection, I find the index to be a useful component of the book, as it comes with a list of linguistic terms in Japanese with their English translations. The book therefore contributes to bridging the gap between theoretical linguists and the Japanese traditional grammar.This aspect of the book would have been better, however, if each insight from the traditional literature had been accompanied by a list of explicit references, especially regarding remarks about dialect-specific patterns and historical changes. For example, on page 27 Labrune discusses various dialects with different vowel systems. The discussion would have been more useful if there had been a reference to the original sources of each dialect, for readers interested in knowing more. Similarly, footnote 1 of Chapter 3 (p. 62) states that in Ancient Japanese stops were realised without affrication before any vowel (unlike Modern Japanese), but again no references are given.Setting aside this problem, the descriptions of Japanese phonology are generally very detailed (partly thanks to the traditional grammar), thereby calling for closer attention from the theoretical literature. The book often approaches 1 A handbook of Japanese phonetics and phonology is currently in preparation (Kubozono to appear).