2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A correction in the algorithm of fatigue life calculation based on the critical plane approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an approach is correct only for materials that have parallel fatigue curves (m σ ∼ = m τ ). This fact has been noticed in, among others, papers (Kurek and Łagoda, 2012;Karolczuk and Kluger, 2014;Karolczuk et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Such an approach is correct only for materials that have parallel fatigue curves (m σ ∼ = m τ ). This fact has been noticed in, among others, papers (Kurek and Łagoda, 2012;Karolczuk and Kluger, 2014;Karolczuk et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…is dedicated to Kluger's stress criterion described in the aforementioned text. However, after minor modifications, it is possible to apply it to all other fatigue criteria based on the concept of critical plane . The form of the algorithm for comparative criteria was presented in Fig.…”
Section: Application Of the New Algorithm For Comparative Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following function was used for assessing the efficiency of fatigue models and suggested algorithms: Pr()T=Prob()NnormalexpTNcalTNexp and the resulting parameter: T()Pr=0.95, …”
Section: Experimental Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…number of cycles to failure), which is not true universally [14,15]. Material parameters are based on conventional values (yield stress, fatigue limit) that are strongly dependent on the methodology of determination and sometimes their existence itself is questionable (fatigue limit being the examplethere's no agreement on whether there is an actual amplitude of stress that isn't damaging).…”
Section: Multiaxial Fatigue Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%