2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13638-019-1436-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cost-effective decentralized vehicle remote positioning and tracking system using BeiDou Navigation Satellite System and Mobile Network

Abstract: Most existing production vehicle tracking services rely on the Global Positioning System (GPS) and a proprietary server/client infrastructure. This type of inflexible and centralized architecture incurs severe vender-dependency and high service cost. In this paper, we propose a cost-effective decentralized vehicle remote positioning and tracking system architecture. This architecture only consists of two components: (1) a vehicle terminal for collecting real-time vehicle location from a navigation satellite sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 shows the comparison of the proposed system with the existing solutions. It shows that the proposed blockchain based mobile theft prevention system not only provides Anti-theft and tracking features, that solutions [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] provides, but also preserves the user's privacy and data, provides security against malicious third-party, secure platform for transaction or Sale/Purchase of device and Transfer of Ownership of device. Therefore, the proposed scheme overcomes the problem in the existing solutions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 1 shows the comparison of the proposed system with the existing solutions. It shows that the proposed blockchain based mobile theft prevention system not only provides Anti-theft and tracking features, that solutions [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] provides, but also preserves the user's privacy and data, provides security against malicious third-party, secure platform for transaction or Sale/Purchase of device and Transfer of Ownership of device. Therefore, the proposed scheme overcomes the problem in the existing solutions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disadvantage of this solution was the potential for a data breach. Wei J et al (2019) [7] proposed a decentralized vehicle remote positioning and tracking system using BeiDou navigation satellite system and Mobile network, which utilised a remote monitoring system based on the combination of BDS (BeiDou navigation satellite) and GSM.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al presented an analysis of code bias based on multipath combination observations, which improved the singlepoint positioning results, and the vertical component decreased by 0.42 m and by 0.28 and 0.1 m in north and east direction [13]. Wei et al designed a remote monitoring system to track vehicles based on the combination of BDS and GSM, only spent little money on low price hardware and mobile network GSM fees [14]. Yang et al introduced the basic performance of BDS-3 and presented that the postprocessing orbit accuracy of the BDS-3 satellites had been increased to 0.059, 0.323, and 0.343 m, respectively, on radial, tangential, and normal directions [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature [35] has explored global positioning systems (GPSs) for lane-level positioning, which achieved a higher positioning accuracy and low complexity. The driving trajectory, speed, and acceleration values of a bus driven by its corresponding driver were intuitively expressed by the precise positioning of a BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS); e.g., Wei et al in [15] introduced a decentralized vehicle remote positioning based on multiple available navigation satellite systems and mobile networks [36]. The considerable challenges of GNSS hinder accurately estimating the urban-wide bus trajectory and speed, including (a) the pseudorange errors sourced from the urban multipath environments [37]; (b) missing data of the GNSS positioning in non-line-of-sight urban scenarios [38]; (c) low-frequency sampling and estimations from the GNSS measurements; and (d) real-time estimations of multiple bus lines over urban-wide areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%