1996
DOI: 10.1016/0040-9383(94)00055-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A covering theorem for hyperbolic 3-manifolds and its applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
219
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(219 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
219
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By Minsky's result that the restriction of a primitive stable representation to a proper free factor of the free group is Schottky, we immediately get the following corollary. Note that the the above corollary can be also obtained by Canary's covering theorem ( [9]) directly.…”
Section: Free Groups With Parabolicsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By Minsky's result that the restriction of a primitive stable representation to a proper free factor of the free group is Schottky, we immediately get the following corollary. Note that the the above corollary can be also obtained by Canary's covering theorem ( [9]) directly.…”
Section: Free Groups With Parabolicsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…First, we can see that the covering of M corresponding to a free factor of F 2g is convex cocompact by using Canary's covering theorem [9]. This shows that if we restrict ρ to a proper free factor, then the representation is Schottky.…”
Section: Free Groups With Parabolicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let p 2 : H 3 /G S 2 → H 3 /G 2 be the covering associated with the inclusion. By the covering theorem proved in Canary [4], the restriction of p 2 to a small neighbourhood of the end e S 2 is a finite-sheeted covering of its image, and in particular, p 2 |S 2 is homotopic to a finite-sheeted covering of a boundary component S 2 of C 2 . Since k|S is homotopic to p 2 • h S as maps to H 3 /G 2 , hence also in C 2 , the restriction k|S is homotopic in C 2 to a finite-sheeted covering of the boundary component S 2 of C 2 , and the end facing that boundary component S 2 has a neighbourhood homeomorphic to S 2 × R.…”
Section: Conclusion Of the Proof Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since M 0 lies in AH(S), it is geometrically tame, and we have inj(x) < R for each x ∈ core(M 0 ) (see [Can2,Thm. 6.2] [Bon1]).…”
Section: 3])mentioning
confidence: 99%