2008
DOI: 10.4310/mrl.2008.v15.n1.a13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A criterion for integral dependence of modules

Abstract: Abstract. Let R be a universally catenary locally equidimensional Noetherian ring. We give a multiplicity based criterion for an arbitrary finitely generated R-module to be integral over a submodule. Our proof is self-contained and implies the previously known numerical criteria for integral dependence of ideals and modules.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If E = F , then j(U |E, N) is equal to j(U , N) in the sense of Ulrich and Validashti [12]. Similar to the relative multiplicities of graded algebras in Remark 3.1, the set of primes q of R for which j t (U q |E q , N q ) = 0 is finite.…”
Section: Relative Multiplicities Of Modulesmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…If E = F , then j(U |E, N) is equal to j(U , N) in the sense of Ulrich and Validashti [12]. Similar to the relative multiplicities of graded algebras in Remark 3.1, the set of primes q of R for which j t (U q |E q , N q ) = 0 is finite.…”
Section: Relative Multiplicities Of Modulesmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…See for instance the discussion at the end of Section 6. Finally, the example discussed in Remark 2.4 in [12] yields the following instance of the relative j-multiplicities of algebras. …”
Section: (A|b M) With a Similarmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We would also like to point out that in the theorem below, we only need to check equality of -multiplicity locally at finitely many prime ideals (c.f. [18]). (i) J is a reduction of I.…”
Section: A Limit Superior Multiplicitymentioning
confidence: 99%