2010
DOI: 10.1142/s1793536910000367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Criterion for Selecting Relevant Intrinsic Mode Functions in Empirical Mode Decomposition

Abstract: Information extraction from time series has traditionally been done with Fourier analysis, which use stationary sines and cosines as basis functions. However, data that come from most natural phenomena are mostly nonstationary. A totally adaptive alternative method has been developed called the Hilbert–Huang transform (HHT), which involves generating basis functions called the intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) via the empirical mode decomposition (EMD). The EMD is a numerical procedure that is prone to numerical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to improved CEEMDAN and the correlation coefficient, the signal reconstitution method can be concluded by employing the following steps.

The original signal is decomposed into IMF i   ( i = 1,2,…, n ) by using the improved CEEMDAN algorithm, and n is the number of IMFs.

All the correlative coefficient value between IMF i and the original signal is calculated using formula (9). The sensitive IMFs are selected according to the correlative coefficient threshold [30], which is shown in formula (10). T1μh=maxμi10×maxμi3i=1,2,,n.

In the formula above, μ i represents the correlative coefficient between IMF i and the original signal, and the maximum number of correlative coefficient is denoted by max⁡( μ i ).

If the correlative coefficient value between IMF i and the original signal is larger than μ h , then the relevant IMF is maintained as the sensitive mode.

…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to improved CEEMDAN and the correlation coefficient, the signal reconstitution method can be concluded by employing the following steps.

The original signal is decomposed into IMF i   ( i = 1,2,…, n ) by using the improved CEEMDAN algorithm, and n is the number of IMFs.

All the correlative coefficient value between IMF i and the original signal is calculated using formula (9). The sensitive IMFs are selected according to the correlative coefficient threshold [30], which is shown in formula (10). T1μh=maxμi10×maxμi3i=1,2,,n.

In the formula above, μ i represents the correlative coefficient between IMF i and the original signal, and the maximum number of correlative coefficient is denoted by max⁡( μ i ).

If the correlative coefficient value between IMF i and the original signal is larger than μ h , then the relevant IMF is maintained as the sensitive mode.

…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitive IMFs are selected according to the correlative coefficient threshold [30], which is shown in formula (10). T1μh=maxμi10×maxμi3i=1,2,,n. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the original signal is decomposed into multiple IMFs, and a single residue which is monotonously increasing or decreasing. Reference [45] mentions that the original signal is expected to have better correlation with relevant IMFs than with the irrelevant IMFs. Generally, these irrelevant IMFs are formed due to interpolation related numerical errors.…”
Section: Algorithm 1: Sifting Process For Emdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this figure, the abscissa mark Ai (i = 1, 2, …, 7) indicates IMFi (i = 1, 2, …, 7) and the original signal. The normal and damage MI thresholds are calculated according to literature [19], with threshold values of 0.1452 and 0.0711, respectively. In addition, Figure 7 shows that the MI value between IMF1 and IMF4 and the original signal under normal state is higher than the threshold of 0.1452, hence, IMF1 and IMF4 are determined as sensitive IMFs.…”
Section: Feature Extraction Of Two Kinds Of Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%