1999
DOI: 10.1093/her/14.3.387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical appraisal of the draw and write technique

Abstract: The draw and write technique is increasingly popular in health education research with children. It is generally employed in the setting of the school classroom and is promoted as a 'bottom-up' approach which enhances participation by children. In this paper we critically appraise the use of this method. Against the background of a consideration of carrying out qualitative health promotion research with children we examine the origins and use of children's drawings in a number of disciplines and practice envir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
146
0
12

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
146
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…As researchers we need to follow-up on the child participants as the activities may invoke negative feelings that could be harmful if left unattended. Our experiences confirm the finding that such creative methods are not easy to employ with children (Backett-Milburn & Mckie, 1999).…”
Section: Scaffolding Is Important When Using Visual Methods With Chilsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…As researchers we need to follow-up on the child participants as the activities may invoke negative feelings that could be harmful if left unattended. Our experiences confirm the finding that such creative methods are not easy to employ with children (Backett-Milburn & Mckie, 1999).…”
Section: Scaffolding Is Important When Using Visual Methods With Chilsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In particular, the increased numbers of pupils drawing pictures related to relationships and play confirms the approach of the health promoting school project. That the data collected using this technique are sensitive to such differences is perhaps confirmation of some of the criticisms of Backett-Milburn and McKie (1999), however it is this very sensitivity that renders it important for evaluation research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…While Backett-Milburn and McKie (1999) suggest that it is likely that children will produce drawings representing the dominant discourses surrounding them, in this case, such activity would not be considered a disadvantage. While the data presented here should not be taken as a benchmark against which to assess Irish children or to compare them with their British or European counterparts, it is the very context in which they have been produced which is of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The first activity for data collection was to invite the children to draw their local environment (n = 133), an established technique in geography research (Lynch, 1977;Matthews, 1992), rather than relying on writing and speaking (Backett-Milburn & McKie, 1999) (Table 3). The children also completed questionnaires on their experiences of and attitudes to their local environment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%