A Critical Review of Relocation Research Specific to Separation and Divorce

Saini, Michael; Allan-Ebron, Daria; Barnes, J. C.

doi:10.1080/10502556.2015.1046797

Cited by 5 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…8 Upon relocation, the nonresident parent will be unable to see the child as frequently as he or she did before. 8 Upon relocation, the nonresident parent will be unable to see the child as frequently as he or she did before.…”

Section: The Mobility Issue and Its Affect On Parenting Schedulesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The impact of a move by either parent has the potential to negatively affect the nonrelocating parent's relationship with the child. 8 Upon relocation, the nonresident parent will be unable to see the child as frequently as he or she did before. Therefore, if such a move, occurs parenting schedules must recognize the new distance created by the move and provide some measure of contact between the long-distance parent and child.…”

Section: The Mobility Issue and Its Affect On Parenting Schedulesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

1‐800‐Skype‐Me

Himel¹,

Paulseth²,

Cohen³

2016

Family Court Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is increasingly common that children of divorce are geographically separated from one of their parents. This article considers the challenges that arise from that reality by exploring this problem from a variety of perspectives and by providing practical tips to minimize the impact of the distance. A review of the Ontario caselaw and Arizona Guidelines reveal that certain factors are important in the resolution of these disputes, including: the age of the child, mode of transportation between homes, distance, prior contact, and feasibility of virtual access. Court‐ordered access may include remedies that, absent the distance issue, may be considered extreme, including moving to overnight/extended access periods for young children, permitting children to travel unaccompanied, favoring the nonresident parent for holidays and vacation time, allowing children to decrease contact with the nonresident parent, and decreasing or terminating child support. Where distance dictates the in‐person and virtual access schedules, creative solutions are critical to the successful resolution of these cases. Forward thinking family law professionals can meaningfully help parents to achieve better outcomes for children.

show abstract

Section: The Mobility Issue and Its Affect On Parenting Schedulesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Mobility Issue and Its Affect On Parenting Schedulesmentioning

confidence: 99%

1‐800‐Skype‐Me

Himel¹,

Paulseth²,

Cohen³

2016

Family Court Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Si bien en procesos de separación o divorcio contenciosos la valoración del sistema de tenencia más adecuado a las necesidades de los hijos menores supone un reto para los profesionales (American Psychological Association, 2010;Austin et al, 2016;Pickar, 2007), los casos de traslado aún conllevan mayor complejidad (Atkinson, 2010;Austin, 2000a;Burt, 2011;Kelly y Lamb, 2003;Saini, Allan-Ebron y Barnes, 2015;Stahl, 2013;Strous, 2007;Waldron, 2005). La dificultad radica en la dicotomía a evaluar (traslado vs. no traslado), no existiendo un término medio en la decisión a adoptar.…”

unclassified

“…Al realizar la evaluación, debemos contemplar que esta va a diferir de las habituales evaluaciones periciales de guarda y custodia (Austin, 2000a;Austin et al, 2016;Rodríguez-Domínguez et al, 2015), por cuanto no únicamente deben tenerse en cuenta los criterios que se han consolidado para esa toma de decisión respecto al mejor interés del menor (Austin, 2015;Saini et al, 2015), sino también los criterios específicos referidos al traslado. Dichos criterios, aunque con sensibles variaciones, han sido recogidos en las regulaciones jurídicas y/o la jurisprudencia de distintos países, así como en la literatura científica (Atkinson, 2010;Austin y Gould, 2006;Domingo, 2011;Duggan, 2007;Elrod, 2006;Kelly y Lamb, 2003;Saini et al, 2015;Stahl, 2016;Warshak, 2013). Sin embargo, desconocemos cuales deben primar en la valoración (Arch, Fabregas y Viñas, 2018;Austin et al, 2016;Saini et al, 2015).…”

unclassified

“…Dichos criterios, aunque con sensibles variaciones, han sido recogidos en las regulaciones jurídicas y/o la jurisprudencia de distintos países, así como en la literatura científica (Atkinson, 2010;Austin y Gould, 2006;Domingo, 2011;Duggan, 2007;Elrod, 2006;Kelly y Lamb, 2003;Saini et al, 2015;Stahl, 2016;Warshak, 2013). Sin embargo, desconocemos cuales deben primar en la valoración (Arch, Fabregas y Viñas, 2018;Austin et al, 2016;Saini et al, 2015). En esta línea, aunque la investigación es escasa, Austin et al (2016) ofrecieron los primeros resultados respecto a la importancia que otorgan los psicólogos forenses a distintos criterios para evaluar casos de solicitudes de traslado de menores, como, por ejemplo, daño potencial en la relación entre el menor y el progenitor que no se traslada, estabilidad mental de los progenitores, grado de conflictividad entre los progenitores, etc.…”

unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

El Cambio de Residencia del Menor tras la Ruptura: la Importancia de los Criterios Valorativos

Fàbregas

Marín

García-Arch

et al. 2020

Anuario De Psicología Jurídica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

El presente estudio descriptivo muestra la valoración que los psicólogos forenses españoles (N = 64), otorgan a los criterios propuestos en la literatura científica para valorar casos de solicitud de traslado de menores tras la ruptura de los progenitores. Los resultados muestran que los profesionales otorgaron una alta importancia a los criterios de evaluación propuestos, situándose en posiciones inferiores criterios relacionados con aspectos de infraestructura y organización familiar, económicos y culturales. Respecto al asesoramiento técnico sobre la conveniencia o inconveniencia del traslado, se aprecia que en pocas ocasiones los profesionales informan de forma favorable al cambio de residencia, mostrando una inclinación por el mantenimiento del statu quo. Child relocation after break up: Importance of evaluative criteria A B S T R A C T This descriptive study analyzes Spanish forensic psychologists' (N = 64) rating of criteria proposed in the scientific literature to assess relocation cases after parents' separation. Our results showed that forensic psychologists gave a high importance to evaluation criteria suggested, giving a lower ranking to criteria related to infrastructural, economic, and cultural aspects. Regarding the technical advice on the convenience or inconvenience of the relocation, it is observed that professionals reported favorably to the change of residence only in few occasions, showing a trend to maintain the statu quo.

show abstract

Associations between parental relocation following separation in childhood and maladjustment in adolescence and young adulthood.

Stevenson¹,

Fabricius²,

Braver³

et al. 2018

Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Petitions by custodial parents to relocate children away from non-custodial parents present difficult choices for family courts. In the current study, the sample (N = 81) was randomly recruited through the children’s schools according to the following criteria: Children were 12 years old and at the time resided primarily with their mothers; mothers had been living with a male partner “acting in a father role” for at least the previous year. Thirty-eight children had been separated by more than an hour’s drive from their biological fathers due to either their mothers or fathers relocating. The data were collected from two reporters (children and mothers) at five time points (child ages 12.5, 14, 15.5, 19.5, and 22) by trained interviewers using standardized measures with adequate reliability and validity. Long-distance separation from biological fathers prior to age 12 was linked in adolescence and young adulthood to serious behavior problems, anxiety and depression symptoms, and disturbed relationships with all three parental figures (i.e., biological fathers, mothers, and step-fathers). These associations held after controlling for mother-stepfather conflict and domestic violence, mothers’ family income, and mother-biological father relationship quality. These longitudinal findings over time replicated the cross-sectional findings of Braver, Ellman, and Fabricius (2003) and Fabricius and Braver (2006). Policy implications for parental long-distance relocation following separation are discussed.

show abstract

A Critical Review of Relocation Research Specific to Separation and Divorce

Cited by 5 publications

References 26 publications

1‐800‐Skype‐Me

1‐800‐Skype‐Me

El Cambio de Residencia del Menor tras la Ruptura: la Importancia de los Criterios Valorativos

Associations between parental relocation following separation in childhood and maladjustment in adolescence and young adulthood.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About