2009
DOI: 10.7275/jg4h-rb87
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critical Review of Research on Formative Assessments: The Limited Scientific Evidence of the Impact of Formative Assessments in Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
17
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This definition acknowledges the performance of authentic tasks (Mueller, 2005) and emphasises the practical application of tasks within a real-world setting (Fook & Sidhu, 2010). Moreover, authentic assessment can enhance instructional practices and fill gaps in the curriculum resulting in increased student performance (Dunn & Mulvenon, 2009).…”
Section: The Rationale For Authentic Assessment In the Curriculummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This definition acknowledges the performance of authentic tasks (Mueller, 2005) and emphasises the practical application of tasks within a real-world setting (Fook & Sidhu, 2010). Moreover, authentic assessment can enhance instructional practices and fill gaps in the curriculum resulting in increased student performance (Dunn & Mulvenon, 2009).…”
Section: The Rationale For Authentic Assessment In the Curriculummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is still much debate about FA. A review of the FA literature shows that there is no consistent discourse or approach in trying to demonstrate the positive effects of FA (Dunn & Mulvenon, 2009). Ruth Butler pointed out that focusing on points or assessment can have a damaging effect on students.…”
Section: Formative Assessment (Fa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, when it comes to the effectiveness of FA practices, it is mainly Black and William (1998) study that was mostly referred to where researchers reviewed more than 250 articles that investigated the issue of FA reaching the conclusion that the research they reviewed "shows conclusively that FA does improve learning," and that the improvements in students' achievement were "amongst the largest ever reported" (p. 61). On the other hand, in their critical analysis of the literature regarding FA, Dunn and Mulvenon (2009) asserted that a significant number of the selected articles in Black and William (1998) seminal work were criticized on the basis of serious methodological concerns. To mention for example, Fuch and Fuch's (1986) meta-analysis examining the impact of FA practices on student achievement, this study was criticized on the basis of the selected population as 83% were students of special needs (handicapped) which compromises the generalizability of its findings.…”
Section: Literature Review: Formative Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%