1975
DOI: 10.1016/0022-4073(75)90065-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical survey of atomic transition probabilities for CuI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also compare our derived abundance ratios with those presented in Marino et al After accounting for the different sets of log(gf ) values, S.S. abundances (see Marino et al 2009), and line-by-line mean offsets (see Appendix), the abundance offsets for most [Fe/H] and [X/Fe] ratios can be immediately accounted for. Offsets in other species (Ti i, Cu i, Zn i, La ii, and Nd ii) are unexplained by these factors but probably result from the S/N and small numbers of features available in the spectra of Marino et al For Kurucz & Bell (1995); (4) Blackwell et al (1982a,b), increased by 0.056 dex according to Grevesse et al (1989); (5) Pickering et al (2001), with corrections given in Pickering et al (2002); (6) Whaling et al (1985), using HFS from Kurucz & Bell (1995) Nitz et al (1999), using HFS from Kurucz & Bell (1995); (14) Cardon et al (1982), using HFS from Kurucz & Bell (1995); (15) Wickliffe & Lawler (1997a); (16) Bielski (1975), using HFS from Kurucz & Bell (1995); (17) Biémont & Godefroid (1980) Note. -The full version of this table is available in the online edition of the journal.…”
Section: Abundance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also compare our derived abundance ratios with those presented in Marino et al After accounting for the different sets of log(gf ) values, S.S. abundances (see Marino et al 2009), and line-by-line mean offsets (see Appendix), the abundance offsets for most [Fe/H] and [X/Fe] ratios can be immediately accounted for. Offsets in other species (Ti i, Cu i, Zn i, La ii, and Nd ii) are unexplained by these factors but probably result from the S/N and small numbers of features available in the spectra of Marino et al For Kurucz & Bell (1995); (4) Blackwell et al (1982a,b), increased by 0.056 dex according to Grevesse et al (1989); (5) Pickering et al (2001), with corrections given in Pickering et al (2002); (6) Whaling et al (1985), using HFS from Kurucz & Bell (1995) Nitz et al (1999), using HFS from Kurucz & Bell (1995); (14) Cardon et al (1982), using HFS from Kurucz & Bell (1995); (15) Wickliffe & Lawler (1997a); (16) Bielski (1975), using HFS from Kurucz & Bell (1995); (17) Biémont & Godefroid (1980) Note. -The full version of this table is available in the online edition of the journal.…”
Section: Abundance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we used the atomic data by Martin et al (1988) for the Mn I lines at 4030, 4033, 4034, 4041, and 4055 Å; the NIST 4 atomic data for the Ba II lines at 4934, 5853, 6141, and 6496 Å; the atomic data by Lawler et al (2001) for the La II lines at 3988, 4086, 4123, and 4238 Å; and the atomic data by Bielski (1975) for the 5105 Å Cu I line 5 . For the CH and CN molecular bands, we used the Kurucz molecular linelists 6 , but we had to revise the log g f values of C downwards 4 http://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/ASD/index.html 5 We could not use the 5872 Å Cu I line since it falls into the gap between the two UVES red CCDs.…”
Section: Equivalent Widths and Atomic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 at 324.7 nm and 327.3 nm. The log g f values were taken from Bielski (1975) and the hyperfine structure and isotopic shifts for the 63 Cu and 65 Cu isotopes from Kurucz (1999). We used the same sources for the two lines of Mult.…”
Section: Atomic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%