2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-021-02689-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical test of twelve methods for estimating age using radiographic staging of developing teeth on a sample of 6- to 15-year-old children from Mérida, Yucatán (México)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They asserted that the error of estimated ages which was reported by many population-specific researches, may be from the different sample distributions, and not from population differences. Rodriguez et al [41] tested the validity of twelve age estimation methods which was based from non-mexican population data or international multi-population data in Mexican children. They reported quite good applicability of the tested methods and argued that the population differences in teeth development may be very small.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They asserted that the error of estimated ages which was reported by many population-specific researches, may be from the different sample distributions, and not from population differences. Rodriguez et al [41] tested the validity of twelve age estimation methods which was based from non-mexican population data or international multi-population data in Mexican children. They reported quite good applicability of the tested methods and argued that the population differences in teeth development may be very small.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it has been reported that the Demirjian et al (1973) method tends to overestimate age (e.g., Liversidge, 2012;Ramirez-Roman et al, 2018). However, this method is arguably the most-commonly used (and thus most comparable with other studies, importantly including Jääsaari and colleagues' work ( 2016)), and a recent article comparing 12 different dental age estimation methods in a Mexican population found relatively minimal differences in outcomes (Rodriguez et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These studies share many structural similarities to this one, such as large samples, uniform age distributions, and reverse regression (stage regressed on age). It is therefore possible that some intergroup differences observed in other studies are in fact sampling or methodological effects (Corron et al, 2018; Rodriguez et al, 2021). Second, differences in developmental timing by ancestry were tested and not found in this particular dataset (Liversidge, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%