2015
DOI: 10.3109/09540261.2015.1083948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical view of transgender health care in Germany: Psychopathologizing gender identity – Symptom of ‘disordered’ psychiatric/psychological diagnostics?

Abstract: After explaining the essential trans* terminology, I offer a short historical overview of the way health care has dealt with the subject of gender, trans* and health in different times. In the third section, I compare the world's most important diagnostic manuals, namely the International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (ICD) and the Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM), i.e. their criteria for 'gender identity disorders' (ICD-10) and 'gender dysphoria'… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
5
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of participants, regardless of transition progress or gender identity, desired psychotherapy, corroborating findings from other studies [35,36,38]. This finding is important, as mandatory psychotherapy and diagnoses have been heavily criticized [45,69,70]. It appears that participants in the sample are aware of psychotherapy’s benefits [3,5].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The majority of participants, regardless of transition progress or gender identity, desired psychotherapy, corroborating findings from other studies [35,36,38]. This finding is important, as mandatory psychotherapy and diagnoses have been heavily criticized [45,69,70]. It appears that participants in the sample are aware of psychotherapy’s benefits [3,5].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Transition‐related healthcare traditionally has been ethically problematic, as trans individuals were, and often still are, subjected to strict clinical assessment before being granted access to treatment (Güldenring, ; Reisner, Poteat, et al, ). Consequently, trans individuals, organisations, and allies have strongly criticised transition‐related treatment regulations and practices (Cabral & Eisfeld, ; GATE, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trans individuals can only have certain transition‐related interventions covered by health insurance companies if their trans experience and need for these interventions have been confirmed by a mental health professional. This system has been causing distress and conflict on individual and stakeholder levels (Degner & Nomanni, ; Güldenring, ; Hamm & Sauer, ), making the sector of trans healthcare (TH) a field of diverse and oftentimes conflicting interests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As gender identity is very personal and only the individual knows this, it can be argued as to whether a professional is able to assess it. 4,48 As a consequence, HCPs working in trans health services may not assess the individual's gender identity but their ability to understand the role of GAMI and their capacity to consent to treatment. Decisions on the necessity and sequence of interventions should be made in a participatory manner in the sense of agreement between treatment seekers and HCPs.…”
Section: Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%