1973
DOI: 10.2307/1964829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critique of KAP Studies and Some Suggestions for Their Improvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The KAP study by definition examines the Knowledge, Attitude towards and Practices concerning antibiotic use in these two groups [20]. In addition, the study was controlled by demographic data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The KAP study by definition examines the Knowledge, Attitude towards and Practices concerning antibiotic use in these two groups [20]. In addition, the study was controlled by demographic data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KAP surveys may be subject to social desirability bias in participant responses. 18,19 In addition, the exact number of participants from the work by Oberhelman and others 10 was not identical to the present study. Our research team was not attempting to reproduce the previous study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The quasi-counterfactual nature of the IFS question has been criticized by scholars who worry that family size preferences are subject to poor reliability and construct validity (Bankole and Westoff 1998). The concept of “ideal family size” may also fail to capture the complex nature of family planning by relying too heavily on rational-choice models of fertility (Cleland 1973; Johnson-Hanks 2007). Although we control for language, cultural and ideational differences within our sample may influence how this question is interpreted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%