Interspeech 2013 2013
DOI: 10.21437/interspeech.2013-231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cross-linguistic study on turn-taking and temporal alignment in verbal interaction

Abstract: That speakers take turns in interaction is a fundamental fact across languages and speaker communities. How this taking of turns is organised is less clearly established. We have looked at interactions recorded in the field using the same task, in a set of three genetically and regionally diverse languages: Georgian, Cabécar, and Fongbe. As in previous studies, we find evidence for avoidance of gaps and overlaps in floor transitions in all languages, but also find contrasting differences between them on these … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cephalic movements (or head movements) have not been widely addressed so far except for nods, tilts, shakes or wags (see McClave, 2000;) from the formal point of view as well as the functional one (see [Hadar, Steiner, Clifford, 1985; Kousidis et al, 2013]). Despite the uni-directed focus of these studies to negation and affirmation, recent years have seen an increase in research considering such functions as back-channel, feedback, as markers of syntactic boundaries within the utterance; as markers of turn-takings; as rhythmic means of speech organization, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cephalic movements (or head movements) have not been widely addressed so far except for nods, tilts, shakes or wags (see McClave, 2000;) from the formal point of view as well as the functional one (see [Hadar, Steiner, Clifford, 1985; Kousidis et al, 2013]). Despite the uni-directed focus of these studies to negation and affirmation, recent years have seen an increase in research considering such functions as back-channel, feedback, as markers of syntactic boundaries within the utterance; as markers of turn-takings; as rhythmic means of speech organization, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%