2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11259-022-10016-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cross-sectional serosurvey of SARS-CoV-2 and co-infections in stray cats from the second wave to the sixth wave of COVID-19 outbreaks in Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are in contrast to another report [ 39 ], which observed no differences in the positive samples in stray cats during different waves of the COVID-19 outbreak in the city of Zaragoza, Spain, for the period of October 2020—January 2022. These contrasting results could be attributed to the different origins of the samples (place of inhabitance, country), hence, different degrees of adherence to the anti-epidemic measures and the consequences thereof.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Our results are in contrast to another report [ 39 ], which observed no differences in the positive samples in stray cats during different waves of the COVID-19 outbreak in the city of Zaragoza, Spain, for the period of October 2020—January 2022. These contrasting results could be attributed to the different origins of the samples (place of inhabitance, country), hence, different degrees of adherence to the anti-epidemic measures and the consequences thereof.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The negative control group comprised clinically healthy cats included in the annual screening program (n = 121) and sick cats seropositive for other pathogens to evaluate cross‐reactivity (n = 25). The other pathogens included the most prevalent pathogens in the Zaragoza region, such as Leishmania infantum (n = 5), Dirofilaria immitis (n = 5), Bartonella henselae (n = 5), FIV (n = 5), and FeLV (n = 5) 9,10 . The inclusion of seropositive samples for other pathogens is commonly performed to evaluate commercial ICTs in small animals 11 …”
Section: Test Results Serologic Results Obtained By In‐house Ifat Tes...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FIV (n = 5), and FeLV (n = 5). 9,10 The inclusion of seropositive samples for other pathogens is commonly performed to evaluate commercial ICTs in small animals. 11 Serologic status was recorded through a retrospective review of the sample files in the laboratory database.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the cut‐off in the absence of serum from a positive status, we used the mean value from a known negative animal population reference and added three standard deviations (SDs) to the mean optical density (OD) to determine the cut‐off, which is the most common approaching used in veterinary diagnostics for detecting different pathogens (Saraswati et al., 2019; Villanueva‐Saz, Martínez, et al., 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%