2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10984-017-9226-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A culturally-adaptive Iranian version of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction to investigate English teachers’ interpersonal behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The strongest disagreement was mainly observed in proximity behaviours, showing that teachers overestimate the positive interactions with their students and thus the quality of their interpersonal relationship. In general, our findings are consistent with previous studies comparing the two perspectives regardless of the methodological approach followed (Brekelmans et al, 2011;Maulana et al, 2012;Safa & Doosti, 2017;Wubbels et al, 1992). To the best of our knowledge, only the study of Maulana et al (2012) applied a similar methodology using the QTI and found a similar degree of perceptions divergence in the Agency and Communion dimensions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The strongest disagreement was mainly observed in proximity behaviours, showing that teachers overestimate the positive interactions with their students and thus the quality of their interpersonal relationship. In general, our findings are consistent with previous studies comparing the two perspectives regardless of the methodological approach followed (Brekelmans et al, 2011;Maulana et al, 2012;Safa & Doosti, 2017;Wubbels et al, 1992). To the best of our knowledge, only the study of Maulana et al (2012) applied a similar methodology using the QTI and found a similar degree of perceptions divergence in the Agency and Communion dimensions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In contrast, the majority of teachers reported lower scores than their students on the uncertain, dissatisfied and confrontational scales. In another study that used independent samples t-tests and effect sizes showed that the magnitude of differences between students' and the teachers' perceptions was large for confrontational, understanding, dissatisfied and compliant scales (Safa & Doosti, 2017). This could mean that students evaluated their teachers' behaviour more highly than their teachers for dissatisfied and reprimanding behaviours and lower for understanding and tolerant behaviours.…”
Section: Comparing the Perceptions Of Students And Teachersmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kecerdasan interpersonal yang menjadi bagian dari kompetensi kepribadian guru menjadi sesuatu yang sangat penting bagi siswa. Hal ini berkorelasi dengan penelitian sebelumnya bahwa melalui kecerdasan interpersonal yang dibangun guru dan siswa dapat menjadi pembangun kedekatan [28], prediktor dari kegembiraan yang ada di kelas [29], dan meminimalkan perilaku negatif siswa [30]. Di dalam islam juga disebutkan bahwa 'adab terlebih dahulu baru kemudian ilmu'.…”
Section: Urgensi Kecerdasan Interpersonal Guru-siswaunclassified
“…Previous research has also shown that high or positive interpersonal relationships can have an impact on student's academic performance (Kiuru et al, 2020), be more prosocial (Shin et al, 2019), have low teacher-student conflicts (McFarland et al, 2016), increase learning motivation (Comer, 1984;Spilt et al, 2012) increase excitement in the classroom (Ahmadi Safa & Doosti, 2017), minimize negative behavior in the classroom (Hagenauer et al, 2015), build closeness and increase student self-efficacy (Spilt et al, 2012). Good interpersonal relationships will make students more open, enthusiastic, and motivated when studying, feel comfortable in learning, and will try to show their best performance in class.Based on these studies, we can find out the urgency of interpersonal relationships between teachers and students.…”
Section:  Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%