2008
DOI: 10.1086/588386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cytomegalovirus Vaccine for Transplantation: Are We Closer?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New antiviral drugs [18], vaccines [19,20], and reconstitution of HCMV cellular immunity [21-23] should be considered when designing new models of HCMV disease prevention.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New antiviral drugs [18], vaccines [19,20], and reconstitution of HCMV cellular immunity [21-23] should be considered when designing new models of HCMV disease prevention.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The timeline in Figure 1 integrates all of the key activities described above and illustrates both the typical and unanticipated factors that can impact product development timelines. A reasonably representative time frame ensued from product concept to completion of phase 1 testing and accordingly the indication of the favorable safety profile and demonstration of immunogenicity in humans [ 38 , 41 ], a vital first stage for a vaccine program. In contrast, the phase 2 trial in HCT recipients took an extended period of time to enroll, largely due to the novelty of the approach and the inherently-complex nature of conducting a vaccine trial in subjects with such underlying conditions and treatment-associated morbidity; furthermore, as described in Section 2.2 , the original premise was to vaccinate donors but due to the limited time donors were available prior to transplant, this proved impractical and this arm was discontinued while leaving the recipient-only arm open.…”
Section: Timeline Summary Of Asp0113 Development Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional assay, the cultured IFN-γ ELISpot assay, was employed to evaluate whether the vaccine primed the memory T-cell response; this assay demonstrated a positive response to pp65 and/or gB in 68.2% (15 out of 22) of HCMV-seronegative subjects, including subjects who did not have detectable responses by ex vivo IFN-γ ELISpot assay or ELISA. These results suggest that the VCL-CB01 vaccine has the ability to prime antigen-specific T cells, with the capacity to proliferate and secrete IFN-γ on restimulation with antigen [43, 44], and that the cultured ELISpot assay appears to be more sensitive than the ex vivo ELISpot assay for the detection of vaccine-induced antigen-specific T-cell responses [42]. A limitation of the VCL-CB01 vaccine was the lack of gB antibody response in HCMV-seropositive subjects, although the vaccine boosted the existing pp65 T-cell response.…”
Section: What Has Gone Into People – An Update On the Status Of Recenmentioning
confidence: 99%