1990
DOI: 10.1300/j075v11n01_05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Daily-Adjusted Goal-Setting and Feedback Procedure for Improving Productivity in a University Admissions Department

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Essentially, greater goal specificity is expected to lead to higher goal attainment, which ultimately should lead to improved performance. This applies to public organizations as well (Perry and Porter 1982;Brewer and Selden 2000;Rodgers and Hunter 1992;Wilk and Redmon 1990).…”
Section: Goal Theoretic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essentially, greater goal specificity is expected to lead to higher goal attainment, which ultimately should lead to improved performance. This applies to public organizations as well (Perry and Porter 1982;Brewer and Selden 2000;Rodgers and Hunter 1992;Wilk and Redmon 1990).…”
Section: Goal Theoretic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include antecedent-based interventions such as task clarification (Anderson, Crowell, Hantula, & Siroky, 1988), training (Geller, Eason, Phillips, & Pierson, 1980), goal-setting (Wilk & Redmon, 1990), and prompting (Austin, Hatfield, Grindle, & Bailey, 1993), as well as consequence-based interventions such as feedback (see Alvero, Bucklin, & Austin, 2001 for a review) and performance-contingent pay (see Bucklin & Dickinson, 2001 for a review). Although these interventions are common in the OBM literature, they are often combined into multi-component or package interventions and are less often examined individually.…”
Section: The Effects Of Task Clarification Visual Prompts and Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many examples of successful applications of organizational behavior management (OBM) for manufacturing tasks (Stoneman & Dickinson, 1989), and other tasks in which a tangible, permanent output is produced such as applications processed (Wilk & Redmon, 1990). Studies dealing with behaviors that are more difficult to measure such as customer service, on the other hand, remain few in number compared to studies that deal with more tangible results.…”
Section: Journal Of Organizational Behavior Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%