IEEE 10th Topical Meeting on Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging (Cat. No. 01TH8565)
DOI: 10.1109/epep.2001.967628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A de-embedding technique for interconnects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5. In order to compensate for the transmission loss of the MSLs outside the reference planes, the "through" patterns that have only a MSL with a length excluding the distance between the reference planes was prepared, and these potions were de-embedded using measured S -parameters [12]. Since the through lines showed very good matching with 50 Ω characteristic impedance, deembedding was done by just subtracting the line losses from the total insertion and return losses as shown in the follow- Return Loss = 20 log 10 S 11,total (ω)…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. In order to compensate for the transmission loss of the MSLs outside the reference planes, the "through" patterns that have only a MSL with a length excluding the distance between the reference planes was prepared, and these potions were de-embedded using measured S -parameters [12]. Since the through lines showed very good matching with 50 Ω characteristic impedance, deembedding was done by just subtracting the line losses from the total insertion and return losses as shown in the follow- Return Loss = 20 log 10 S 11,total (ω)…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of a characterization method is essentially determined by the accuracy of its de-embedding algorithm. Most de-embedding methods are based on the twoline method, which measures two transmission lines of the same cross-section with different lengths [1,2,3]. For example, the two stripline test vehicles in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two striplines (4 mm and 8 mm in length) were designed to have the same via transition to the probing pad. Measured S-parameters were de-embedded using two variants of the two-line method: the L-2L method [1] and the LiLj method [2]. The extracted DK values are compared in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%