A decentred assessment of the impact of ‘informal governance’ on democratic legitimacy

Abstract

The aim of this article is to examine the impact of informal governance on democratic legitimacy. It draws on the literatures on informal governance and decentred theory to examine how governance mechanisms that are un-written, un-codified and non-institutional impact on democratic legitimacy in governance networks. Drawing on a case study of English devolution in the United Kingdom, this article explores how informal governance impacts on different dimensions of legitimacy -input, throughout and output. It does so by drawing on the narratives and stories of central government officials directly involved in English devolution between 2015 and 2018. Findings reveal that even when formal structures are weak, democratic legitimacy can be secured, especially in promoting effective decision making and problem solving -throughput legitimacy. Nonetheless, a decentred analysis has shown a high level of selectivity and differentiation in central-local relationships that undermines legitimation based on input (inclusiveness) and outcome (results) legitimacy. This assessment provides important new insights into how governance networks characterized by high levels of informality can promote democratic legitimacy in ways that reflect the nuances of political decision making in highly complex environments. The challenge for politicians and policy makers moving forward is to actively manage the inevitable trade-offs generated through the use of informality if accusations of a democratic deficit are to be averted.

Developing “place leadership” when hierarchical accountability is omnipresent: the case of English sub-national government

“…However, it also blurs the distinction between principal and agent, obscuring a clear route for accountability to the local electorate. Ayres (2020) warns of the threat to political legitimacy that can arise where policies depend on stakeholder consensus to provide accountability, regardless of the policies' quality and efficiency.…”

The UK Government’s COVID-19 Policy: What Does “Guided by the Science” Mean in Practice?

“…Formal institutions are central to the official story, while the informal "rules of the game" facilitate policy behind the scenes. Both are essential to make sense of the idea of UK government policy "guided by the science," since: ministers only pay attention to a small proportion of science guided policy, and most potential advisors will struggle to navigate the "informal governance" of the UK political system if it operates so differently to its formal image (Ayres, 2020).…”

Editorial A new research agenda for decentering public leadership

“…This involves making an emotional connection with people to exert influence through a collaborative endeavor, rather than employing bureaucratic authority. Indeed, this feature of political leadership was explored by Ayres (2021) in her decentered analysis of informal decision-making in Whitehall, whereby social relationships were used to exert control as opposed to hierarchy. Indeed, the literatures on informal governance and decentered theory are natural bedfellows.…”