2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2010.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A decision support system for order acceptance/rejection in hybrid MTS/MTO production systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
38
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, Ebadian et al (2009) addressed acceptance/rejection procedure of MTO orders. However, the two most similar papers, compared to this paper, are the ones by Kalantari et al (2011), Rafiei et Rabbani (2012), andKou et al (2016). In the developed model by Kalantari et al (2011), customers were prioritized upon some measures, using two methods AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS, and production capacities were assigned upon the prioritization results.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, Ebadian et al (2009) addressed acceptance/rejection procedure of MTO orders. However, the two most similar papers, compared to this paper, are the ones by Kalantari et al (2011), Rafiei et Rabbani (2012), andKou et al (2016). In the developed model by Kalantari et al (2011), customers were prioritized upon some measures, using two methods AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS, and production capacities were assigned upon the prioritization results.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…They also developed a mathematical model to match the orders with the unfinished inventories. Some issues are notable about the model of Kalantari et al (2011); the proposed matching model worked upon the order forecasts, while it is not acceptable about the coming orders with specific customization to be forecasted (the matching process is considered in make-to-forecast production environment). They assumed all coming orders are negotiable, while it is not the case in the real-world industrial contexts.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, (5) shows the addedassembly decision of product 2 in the ATO phase 2 , which is constrained by the quantity of component 3 and demand fulfilment shortage ( 2 , 2 ) + . Equation (6) implies that the total quantities of added products 1 and 2 must not exceed the available inventory of component 4. Equation (7) shows that the quantity of products 1 and 2 is nonnegative.…”
Section: Problem Formulation and Optimality Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tsubone et al [5] investigated the production-planning system for a combination of MTS and MTO products. Kalantari et al [6] developed a decision support system for order acceptance/rejection in hybrid MTS/MTO production systems. Soman et al [7] reviewed the combined MTO/MTS production situations and developed 2 Mathematical Problems in Engineering a comprehensive hierarchical planning framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…u= Q=mty w |QDvqm |xr=kt QO |OwQw |=yxO=O |x}k@ w "CU= xOt; 8 pwOH QO |O=yvW}B pOt pL x@ \w@Qt C= Q}taD w |Q=Oxov Q}eDt =@ w C= Q}taD w |Q=Oxov uDiQoQ_vQO uwO@ pOt wO G}=Dv 9 pwOH QO u}vJty CU= u}= Qou=Wv G}=Dv w OvwW|t xU}=kt sy =@ C= Q}taD w |Q=Oxov uDiQoQ_vQO w |QDvqm pOt x@ C@Uv C= Q}taD w |Q=Oxov uDiQoQ_vQO =@ |O=yvW}B pOt xm xDW=O xv} Ry Vy=m OYQO 14 [11] 'C= Q}taD w |Q=Oxov uDiQoQ_vQO …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%