2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.07.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A decision support tool for simulating the effects of alternative policies affecting water resources: an application at the European scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[13] Multicriterion decision analysis (MCDA) traditionally has been used in water resource literature as a major component of decision support systems (DSS) [Stansbury et al, 1991;Goicoechea et al, 1992;Qureshi and Harrison, 2001;Fassio et al, 2005]. The central role of the MCDA technique is a trade-off analysis that compares the impacts of each alternative and indicates which alternative most nearly satisfies all relevant concerns (criteria).…”
Section: Multicriterion Decision Analysis Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[13] Multicriterion decision analysis (MCDA) traditionally has been used in water resource literature as a major component of decision support systems (DSS) [Stansbury et al, 1991;Goicoechea et al, 1992;Qureshi and Harrison, 2001;Fassio et al, 2005]. The central role of the MCDA technique is a trade-off analysis that compares the impacts of each alternative and indicates which alternative most nearly satisfies all relevant concerns (criteria).…”
Section: Multicriterion Decision Analysis Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a useful technique, especially when the impacts cannot be readily estimated in monetary terms [Belton and Stewart, 2003]. The MCDA technique has been applied to an array of problems in water resources, including water transfer options and reservoir operation [Stansbury et al, 1991;Ko et al, 1992;Harboe, 1992;Bogardi and Duckstein, 1992;Roy et al, 1992;Tecle, 1992;Srdjevic et al, 2004;Raju and Duckstein, 2004;Fassio et al, 2005], design of monitoring networks [Woldt and Bogardi, 1992;Harmancioglu and Alpaslan, 1992], various applications in forestry [Huth et Lasch et al, 2005], wastewater treatment alternatives [Tecle et al, 1988;Khalil et al, 2005], and computer-assisted tools for negotiation of water resources conflicts [Thiessen and Loucks, 1992].…”
Section: Multicriterion Decision Analysis Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mysiak et al (2005) make a multi-criteria evaluation for several European countries. Fassio et al (2005) assess different measures for supporting both EU Nitrates Directive and the WFD. Glimour et al (2005) and Letcher et al (2007) develop a framework to improve integrated water resource assessments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of DSS emerged in the 1970s when it was proposed for computerized systems to assist in addressing semi-structured and unstructured problems [14,15]. Over the past few decades, considerable work on DSS has been conducted in the fields of water resources, water quality, and river management, resulting in a variety of decision support systems (e.g., SWQAT [11], Elbe-DSS [16], MULINO Decision Support System [17], RiverSpill [18], Sonhua River Pollution EDSS [19], WaterWare [20], AQUATOOL [21], FLOODSS [22], DSSIPM [23]), ranging from design to planning, management and operations, and they have been presented at different scales [24]. GIS is an information system for capturing, storing, analyzing, managing, and presenting data that are spatially referenced (linked to location) [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%