2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2018.05.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A decision support tool for the order promising process with product homogeneity requirements in hybrid Make-To-Stock and Make-To-Order environments. Application to a ceramic tile company

Abstract: A decision support tool for the order promising process with product homogeneity requirements in hybrid Make-To-Stock and Make-To-Order environments. Application to a ceramic tile company. Computers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Number of Subtypes (S.): The total number of existing subtypes of each LHP-item depends on the attributes used in the classification stage and their possible values. For instance, in the ceramics sector, each piece has to be inspected and classified, and individual models (products) are usually stored in homogeneous subgroups (subtypes) according to quality (aspect), tone (degree of colour) and calibre (thickness) (Alemany et al 2018;Alarcón et al 2011;Davoli et al 2010). The usual consideration of 3 quality grades, 2 tones and 3 calibres in the same model (finished good) could add up 13 different references.…”
Section: Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Number of Subtypes (S.): The total number of existing subtypes of each LHP-item depends on the attributes used in the classification stage and their possible values. For instance, in the ceramics sector, each piece has to be inspected and classified, and individual models (products) are usually stored in homogeneous subgroups (subtypes) according to quality (aspect), tone (degree of colour) and calibre (thickness) (Alemany et al 2018;Alarcón et al 2011;Davoli et al 2010). The usual consideration of 3 quality grades, 2 tones and 3 calibres in the same model (finished good) could add up 13 different references.…”
Section: Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu and Shen [20] evaluated the impacts of the MPS and throughput on scheduling in production environments with CPSs and the IoT. Alemany et al [21] presented a decision support tool based on a mathematical model to calculate the amount available to promise. Serrano-Ruiz et al [22] proposed a conceptual framework of the MPS 4.0 based on digital twins and machine learning for zero-defect management in the supply chain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the development of optimization and decision support tools is needed to obtain all the benefits of transactional information technology (IT), improving the economic performance and customer satisfaction of supply chains (Grossmann, 2005). Along these lines, mathematical programming models have been demonstrated to be powerful optimization tools to support decision makers in many supply chain processes such as: production planning (Alemany et al, 2013), order promising (Alemany et al, 2018;Grillo et al, 2017), shortage planning , supply chain production and transport planning (Mula et al, 2010), among others. The agriculture sector also faces many complex problems for optimization (Saranya & Amudha, 2017) as it has been reported in some recent works (Cid-Garcia & Ibarra-Rojas, 2019;Grillo et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%