1980
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/141.4.532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Decisive Period in the Antibiotic Prophylaxis of Cutaneous Lesions Caused by Bacteroides fragilis in Guinea Pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
4

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…16,[19][20] Post-operative complications and prophylactic antiobiotics There is a considerable volume of evidence that advocates antibiotics for the prevention of infection following third molar surgery. 13,[21][22][23][24][25][26] Other articles do not specifically comment on infection rates but support the use of antibiotics on the basis of reduced postoperative complications. 27 Improvement from trismus, reduction of pain and swelling with improved healing are outcomes that have been used to assess the success of antibiotics.…”
Section: Complications After Third Molar Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16,[19][20] Post-operative complications and prophylactic antiobiotics There is a considerable volume of evidence that advocates antibiotics for the prevention of infection following third molar surgery. 13,[21][22][23][24][25][26] Other articles do not specifically comment on infection rates but support the use of antibiotics on the basis of reduced postoperative complications. 27 Improvement from trismus, reduction of pain and swelling with improved healing are outcomes that have been used to assess the success of antibiotics.…”
Section: Complications After Third Molar Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the value of preoperative parenteral antibiotics, a body of evidence favours their use [21][22][23]41 in third molar surgery. Extensive studies of third molar removal in patients with fully or partial bony infection of third molars favour the use of prophylactic parenteral antibiotics, since lower postoperative infection rates have been reported.…”
Section: Parenteral Antibiotics Support For Their Use and Timingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os resultados do ensaio de Burke 8 , com porquinhos-da-Índia, indicaram que o antimicrobiano deve estar circulando e presente nos tecidos no momento em que ocorrer a incisão e a contaminação bacteriana do sítio operatório. Em 1980, Shapiro et al 9 confirmaram os achados de Burke, encontrando diferença significativa entre o diâmetro da lesão dos animais que receberam o antimicrobiano 1 hora antes da inoculação intradérmica de bactérias e o daqueles que receberam a droga 4 horas após a inoculação ou não receberam a droga. Dois estudos bem desenhados, em humanos, apóiam os achados relativos à importância da cobertura antimicrobiana no momento da cirurgia 10,11 .…”
Section: Metodologia Evidências Básicasunclassified
“…Diferença de taxas: modelo de efeitos fixos DT: 6,1 (1,(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)9) DT: 3,0 (-1,0-7,0)…”
Section: C) Heterogeneidade Clínica Entre Os Ensaiosunclassified
“…One factor that determines the efficacy of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis is the presence of antibiotics in tissues at the time of surgical incision and of contamination of the wound. Propyhlactic antibiotics should be adminis tered prior to beginning surgery to be opti mally effective [3,4], Whether persistence of measurable antibiotic levels in tissues throughout the duration of surgical proce dure is necessary is not known. Platt et al…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%