2017 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/wacv.2017.84
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Deep Learning Frame-Work for Recognizing Developmental Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results show that different facial attributes are statistically significant and improve classification performance by about 7%. A deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) for feature extraction followed by an SVM for classification has been trained by Shukla et al 60 to detect whether a person in an image has ASD, cerebral palsy, Down syndrome, foetal alcohol spectrum syndrome, progeria or other intellectual disabilities. Their results indicate that their model has an accuracy of 98.80% and performs better than average human intelligence in distinguishing between different disorders.…”
Section: Facial Expression/emotionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results show that different facial attributes are statistically significant and improve classification performance by about 7%. A deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) for feature extraction followed by an SVM for classification has been trained by Shukla et al 60 to detect whether a person in an image has ASD, cerebral palsy, Down syndrome, foetal alcohol spectrum syndrome, progeria or other intellectual disabilities. Their results indicate that their model has an accuracy of 98.80% and performs better than average human intelligence in distinguishing between different disorders.…”
Section: Facial Expression/emotionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few studies (Gurovich et al, 2019;Mor & Dardeck, 2018;Rad et al, 2018;Shukla, Gupta, Saini, Singh, & Balasubramanian, 2017) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted September 29, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.29.20203810 doi: medRxiv preprint disorders because neuroimaging is rarely used in psychology because of its high cost (Galatzer-Levy et al, 2014). Mor and Dardeck (2018)…”
Section: Deep Learning and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few studies (Gurovich et al, 2019; Mor & Dardeck, 2018; Rad et al, 2018; Shukla, Gupta, Saini, Singh, & Balasubramanian, 2017) have been published on using deep learning that do not employ neuroimaging to flag possible mental disorders. This fact impedes the implementation of deep learning in the diagnostic screening process of mental disorders because neuroimaging is rarely used in psychology because of its high cost (Galatzer-Levy et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been shown that they can be trained to be highly robust for imaging variation, reducing the need for highly controlled subject poses (Xiangyu Zhu et al, 2015). There are a number of current research and commercial efforts to create fully automated analysis pipelines for clinical interpretation of dysmorphologies (Ansari et al, 2014; Ferry et al, 2014; Manousaki et al, 2015; Basel-Vanagaite et al, 2016; Gripp et al, 2016; Baynam et al, 2017; Bengani et al, 2017; Dudding-Byth et al, 2017; Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study, 2017; Gardner et al, 2017; Hadj-Rabia et al, 2017; Kruszka et al, 2017a; Kruszka et al, 2017b; Kruszka et al, 2017c; Lumaka et al, 2017; Shukla et al, 2017; Valentine et al, 2017; Reijnders et al, 2018b; Gurovich et al, 2018; Knaus et al, 2018; Kruszka et al, 2018; Liehr et al, 2018; Pantel et al, 2018; Reijnders et al, 2018a; Reijnders et al, 2018b; Zarate et al, 2018). However, all these efforts are meeting the same barriers to progression of the methods and prospects for clinical impact, challenges to do with data access, ethics, governance, and security.…”
Section: Phenotyping From Photographsmentioning
confidence: 99%