2020 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Civil Aviation Safety and Information Technology (ICCASIT 2020
DOI: 10.1109/iccasit50869.2020.9368623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Deep learning Method for Landing Pitch Prediction based on Flight Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the rise of deep learning and in order to capture time-series features, Tong et al [9] proposed a model based on the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network to predict a hard landing. The same model was also used to address the landing speed prediction problem [19] and the tail strike risk prediction problem [20]. Kang et al [21] further proposed a deep sequence-tosequence model based on LSTM and an attention mechanism to improve the landing speed prediction accuracy.…”
Section: Safety Incident Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rise of deep learning and in order to capture time-series features, Tong et al [9] proposed a model based on the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network to predict a hard landing. The same model was also used to address the landing speed prediction problem [19] and the tail strike risk prediction problem [20]. Kang et al [21] further proposed a deep sequence-tosequence model based on LSTM and an attention mechanism to improve the landing speed prediction accuracy.…”
Section: Safety Incident Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was able to identify events from the multidimensional time series that are correlated with the high-speed exceedance incidents. Chen et al [21] proposed a LSTM deep model for landing pitch prediction so as to reduce the tail strike risk. One deficiency of the LSTM and GRU models is that they only generate predictions for the next moment and cannot provide predictions for the trend of near future.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al. [21] proposed a LSTM deep model for landing pitch prediction so as to reduce the tail strike risk. One deficiency of the LSTM and GRU models is that they only generate predictions for the next moment and cannot provide predictions for the trend of near future.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, structural data is the main subject of current research, and the processing and analysis of QAR data is a top priority of current research due to the advantages of completeness and reliability of QAR data. In this regard, related scholars [22][23][24] have proposed using an LSTM model to analyze QAR data for predictive evaluation of the associated risks. After that, affiliated scholars made continuous improvements based on LSTM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%