2000
DOI: 10.1007/s002140000177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A density functional theory study of the conformational properties of 1,2-ethanediamine: protonation and solvent effects

Abstract: The structures and the conformational energies of nonprotonated, monoprotonated and diprotonated 1,2-ethanediamine have been investigated through density functional theory. The relative performance of local and gradient-corrected functionals is discussed. The existence of hydrogen-bond formation has been determined with electron localisation function calculations. Proton anities for nonprotonated and monoprotonated 1,2-ethanediamine have been calculated and are in agreement with experimental data. The in¯uence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The large difference may be explained by the restricted conformation of the di‐protonated state, that is, anti ‐form, which is presumably due to the electrostatic repulsion of two protonated amines, along with butane effect as steric hindrance . On the other hand, the mono‐protonated state is likely to take a gauche conformation . Thus, ethylenediamine moiety would suffer from thermodynamic penalty toward the di‐protonation; as a result, ethylenediamine moiety in PGlu(DET) was mono‐protonated at pH 7.4 ( α =55), and the di‐protonation was initiated around tumorous pH in a stepwise manner.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large difference may be explained by the restricted conformation of the di‐protonated state, that is, anti ‐form, which is presumably due to the electrostatic repulsion of two protonated amines, along with butane effect as steric hindrance . On the other hand, the mono‐protonated state is likely to take a gauche conformation . Thus, ethylenediamine moiety would suffer from thermodynamic penalty toward the di‐protonation; as a result, ethylenediamine moiety in PGlu(DET) was mono‐protonated at pH 7.4 ( α =55), and the di‐protonation was initiated around tumorous pH in a stepwise manner.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the reaction energy barrier of the process is generally high. EDA has the characteristics of simple structure, strong reducibility, and rotational isomerism of the molecule [25]. The electron-diffraction data and the quantum chemical calculation indicate that EDA is mainly in the gauche conformation (the N–C–C–N dihedral angle is in the range of 64 ± 4°) [26,27] in the gaseous phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protonated ethylenediamine has been studied previously with mass spectrometry and computational chemistry. , From proton transfer reactions in the gas phase, it is known that diamines display a larger proton affinity than monoamines of comparable size. ,,, Additionally, large negative entropy changes indicate the formation of cyclic intramolecular hydrogen bonds. The (negative) enthalpy of ring formation −Δ H ° ring form for ethylenediamine has been estimated to be greater than 9.7 kcal mol –1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%