2003
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2003.0184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A detection method for Legionella spp in (cooling) water: fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) on whole bacteria

Abstract: Although traditional culture methods are appropriate for detection of Legionella species, such culture takes several days. Rapid detection (< 24 h) of individual Legionella is possible using fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) on whole bacteria. Water samples were filtered and the concentrated bacteria were immediately detected (without culture) with a fluorescence microscope following appropriate labelling. The detection level was very high and quantification was possible. For the detection of all Legion… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The NRCL anti-L. pneumophila sg 1 polyclonal antibody does not cross-react with other serogroups (data not shown). The Accurate Chemical & Scientific anti-L. pneumophila polyclonal antibody was found to be specific for sgs 1,6,7, and 12, as demonstrated by tests on L. pneumophila type strains (data not shown). The specificity of the MAbs from Dresden has already been reported for the different serogroups (10).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The NRCL anti-L. pneumophila sg 1 polyclonal antibody does not cross-react with other serogroups (data not shown). The Accurate Chemical & Scientific anti-L. pneumophila polyclonal antibody was found to be specific for sgs 1,6,7, and 12, as demonstrated by tests on L. pneumophila type strains (data not shown). The specificity of the MAbs from Dresden has already been reported for the different serogroups (10).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Additional problems with culture detection include low sensitivity, microbial contamination inhibiting Legionella growth, and the potential presence of viable but nonculturable bacteria (VBNC) (3,13,23). Methods based on direct detection, combining immunofluorescent labeling (IF) (19) or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) (4,7,22) with detection by epifluorescence microscopy or flow cytometry (25), allow a more rapid detection of Legionella cells and avoid most of the problems encountered with culture. However, these techniques cannot be applied to the detection of rare events (15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus essential to use a more powerful technique for legionellae detection in environmental samples. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) using genus-specific fluorescently labelled oligonucleotide probe, complementary to a conserved target sequence of the 16S rRNA region, has been shown to be a useful method for the detection and identification of slow growing, fastidious or nonculturable micro-organisms without cultivation (Amann et al 1991;Kalmbach et al 1997;Declerck et al 2003). Two problems were encountered by the use of FISH for detecting bacteria in natural water: (i) the low level of targeted rRNA (low fluorescence) and (ii) the inability to distinguish viable from nonviable cells (Villarino et al 2000;Garcia-Armisen and Servais 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For quantification of microorganisms with FISH a certain cultivation time on a filter is necessary before fluorescence labeled oligonucleotides are incubated with lysed cells. Otherwise the detection limit is very high (Declerck et al, 2003). The quantification is carried out with a fluorescence microscope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%