2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7cp00344g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A DFT study of the interplay between dopants and oxygen functional groups over the graphene basal plane – implications in energy-related applications

Abstract: Understanding the ways graphene can be functionalized is of great importance for many contemporary technologies. Using density functional theory calculations we investigate how vacancy formation and substitutional doping by B, N, P and S affect the oxidizability and reactivity of the graphene basal plane. We find that the presence of these defects enhances the reactivity of graphene. In particular, these sites act as strong attractors for OH groups, suggesting that the oxidation of graphene could start at thes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

18
53
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
18
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Atomic hydrogen forms covalent bonds with non-doped, non-strained graphene (C54(0%)), with preferential C-top adsorption site (~1.13 Å directly above one C atom) and the adsorption energy of -0.81 (-0.87) eV (in agreement with previous literature reports [28,40,53,54]). This interaction results in previous report [47]). The preferential H adsorption site on the studied strained surfaces is the same as on the corresponding non-strained surfaces (Fig.…”
Section: Atomic Hydrogen Adsorptionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Atomic hydrogen forms covalent bonds with non-doped, non-strained graphene (C54(0%)), with preferential C-top adsorption site (~1.13 Å directly above one C atom) and the adsorption energy of -0.81 (-0.87) eV (in agreement with previous literature reports [28,40,53,54]). This interaction results in previous report [47]). The preferential H adsorption site on the studied strained surfaces is the same as on the corresponding non-strained surfaces (Fig.…”
Section: Atomic Hydrogen Adsorptionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The preference of impurity sites towards the oxidation can be explained in terms of charge redistribution upon the introduction of the impurity into graphene matrix and the subsequent disruption of the π electronic system. The electronegativity of B is lower than that of C, hence some charge is transferred from B to C. Based on the above, it is clear that oxygen tends to bind close to the dopant atoms in graphene, suggesting that these sites can be considered as the sites of increased reactivity where functionalization can be performed effectively [27]. Considering our previous results on OH adsorption on doped graphene [27], the O adsorption can be considered as next oxidation step.…”
Section: Graphene Surface Functionalization By Oxygenmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The electronegativity of B is lower than that of C, hence some charge is transferred from B to C. Based on the above, it is clear that oxygen tends to bind close to the dopant atoms in graphene, suggesting that these sites can be considered as the sites of increased reactivity where functionalization can be performed effectively [27]. Considering our previous results on OH adsorption on doped graphene [27], the O adsorption can be considered as next oxidation step. This also reinforces previous conclusions that during the surface reduction it would be more difficult to remove oxygen functional groups from the area affected by dopants.…”
Section: Graphene Surface Functionalization By Oxygenmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations