2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2015.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A different approach to solar cell simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This function is derived from the thermionic current expression given in equation (1 The voltage dependence of the BH in the MIS diodes, that is, the barrier increase with increasing forward bias voltage in the forward bias I -V measurements comes from the potential change across the interfacial layer rather than from image force lowering. The potential drop across the HfO 2 interfacial layer varies with bias due to the electrical field present in the semiconductor and the change in the interface state charge as a result of the applied voltage, and thus modifies the BH [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. As mentioned by Budhraja et al [22,23], the interface Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This function is derived from the thermionic current expression given in equation (1 The voltage dependence of the BH in the MIS diodes, that is, the barrier increase with increasing forward bias voltage in the forward bias I -V measurements comes from the potential change across the interfacial layer rather than from image force lowering. The potential drop across the HfO 2 interfacial layer varies with bias due to the electrical field present in the semiconductor and the change in the interface state charge as a result of the applied voltage, and thus modifies the BH [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. As mentioned by Budhraja et al [22,23], the interface Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the potential fluctuation model [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] which is related to thermionic emission over a GD of Schottky barriers, the temperature dependence expressions of the ideality factor and BH are given by [41][42][43] 1…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[108] and [60,65]. Recently, Kavasoglu et al [117] have evaluated the variations of SBH by using GD, and have obtained total current by performing numerical integration taking contributions from each elementary diode. They have studied the random multidiode model for Au/n -GaN device, and have assumed the device to have spatially inhomogeneous barrier height, and have considered that the changes in barrier heights of elementary diodes distribute as random, and have argued that this kind of distribution can be a more realistic approximation to real Schottky contact because it is probable that random distribution of BHs of elementary diodes becomes around the mean value within the distribution limits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%