2010 International Symposium on System on Chip 2010
DOI: 10.1109/issoc.2010.5625547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A digit-set-interleaved radix-8 division/square root kernel for double-precision floating point

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if the same circuit is implemented in different technology, the power consumption is obviously different. In Table 4, the power consumption of [13,16] implemented in 90 nm technology is about nine times than [14,15]. However, even compared with [14,15], which are implemented in 40 nm technology, the proposed structure also achieves lower dynamic power under the same calculation cycles and precision.…”
Section: Implement Results and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Even if the same circuit is implemented in different technology, the power consumption is obviously different. In Table 4, the power consumption of [13,16] implemented in 90 nm technology is about nine times than [14,15]. However, even compared with [14,15], which are implemented in 40 nm technology, the proposed structure also achieves lower dynamic power under the same calculation cycles and precision.…”
Section: Implement Results and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 4, the power consumption of [13,16] implemented in 90 nm technology is about nine times than [14,15]. However, even compared with [14,15], which are implemented in 40 nm technology, the proposed structure also achieves lower dynamic power under the same calculation cycles and precision. Therefore, the proposed square-root structure is also suitable for power sensitive processor design.…”
Section: Implement Results and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Today, the most of implementations of high-performance divider widely use the classic high-radix algorithm in conjunction with a redundant residual representation like carry-save. 13,14 The reason is that high-radix implementations could o®er a superior performance due to the parallelism. However, high-radix implementations require a dedicated hardware, leading to more area cost.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%