A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India

Abstract

<jats:p>Widespread belief in misinformation circulating online is a critical challenge for modern societies. While research to date has focused on psychological and political antecedents to this phenomenon, few studies have explored the role of digital media literacy shortfalls. Using data from preregistered survey experiments conducted around recent elections in the United States and India, we assess the effectiveness of an intervention modeled closely on the world’s largest media literacy campaign, which provided “tips” on how to spot false news to people in 14 countries. Our results indicate that exposure to this intervention reduced the perceived accuracy of both mainstream and false news headlines, but effects on the latter were significantly larger. As a result, the intervention improved discernment between mainstream and false news headlines among both a nationally representative sample in the United States (by 26.5%) and a highly educated online sample in India (by 17.5%). This increase in discernment remained measurable several weeks later in the United States (but not in India). However, we find no effects among a representative sample of respondents in a largely rural area of northern India, where rates of social media use are far lower.</jats:p>

Inoculating Against Fake News About COVID-19

“…A practical application of inoculation theory in the context of COVID-19 misinformation is the new online game, Go Viral!, 2 developed in collaboration with the United Kingdom government and the WHO in which players learn to resist three manipulation techniques commonly used to spread misinformation about the coronavirus: fearmongering, the use of fake experts, and conspiracy theories. An open question in active inoculation research is the extent to which inoculation can boost truth-discernment skills, that is, not just the ability to spot and resist misinformation attacks but also the ability to better identify real or credible news (Guess et al, 2020;Roozenbeek et al, 2020a). Compton et al (2016) called for more "work that pushes forward our understanding of persuasion and has applied value as a health messaging strategy to help combat serious threats to healthy living" (p. 1).…”

“…Further complications arise from the "continued influence effect" of misinformation, which states that people may continue to believe misinformation even after it has been debunked (Ecker et al, 2010;Lewandowsky et al, 2012). In addition, while media literacy initiatives are important and can be effective under the right conditions (Bode and Vraga, 2015;Guess et al, 2020;Van Bavel et al, 2020), they are often expensive to develop, slow to roll out, and reactive rather than proactive.…”

A practical guide to doing behavioural research on fake news and misinformation

“…Using actual true and false content from social media is particularly important if one wants to make the argument that their favored intervention is likely to have an impact if implemented in the real world. This research has looked at factors such as fact-checking (Pennycook, Bear, Collins, & Rand, 2020), emphasizing news sources/publishers (Dias, Pennycook, & Rand, 2020), digital media literacy tips (Guess et al, 2020), and subtly prompting people to think about accuracy to improve sharing decisions (Pennycook, Epstein, et al, 2020;Pennycook, McPhetres, et al, 2020).…”

"Fact-checking" videos reduce belief in misinformation and improve the quality of news shared on Twitter

“…And constraints on time and resources put pressure on professional fact-checkers to keep up with the latest "fake news" stories before they hit social media. For these reasons, social scientists have increasingly turned to prebunking rather than debunking strategies (van der Linden 2019; Guess et al 2020). In other words, they seek to equip citizens with broadly applicable tools to recognize "fake news" stories in order to prevent belief and sharing, instead of correcting beliefs after the damage is already done.…”

“…Elderly social media users -arguably due to shortfalls in digital media literacy and a failure to discern "fake" from "real" online -are among the worst offenders when it comes to sharing "fake news" on multiple social media platforms (Guess, Nagler and Tucker 2019;Osmundsen et al 2020). Finally, Guess et al (2020) recently demonstrated that exposure to Facebook's "Tips to Spot False News," a short list of simple tools for identifying misleading news, improved the ability to discern between false and mainstream news story headlines; an improvement that remained measurable more than two weeks later after the intervention.…”