2008
DOI: 10.2111/07-012.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Direct Approach for Quantifying Stream Shading

Abstract: Management and regulatory standards for stream shading have been established to mitigate excessive stream temperature. Existing shade assessment tools, however, are inadequate for monitoring extensive stream networks. Our objectives were to develop and evaluate an efficient, low-cost field technique for sampling stream-surface shading using digital images and to evaluate the efficiencies and effectiveness of eight different digital image analysis techniques for shade assessments. We developed a quadrat-based t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to the use of UAVs for canopy cover monitoring, methods were limited by the spatial extent that could be covered due to most survey elevations, as well as the cost and time needed to perform the surveys. As recently as 2017, imagery taken from a height of 2-5 m above a stream's water surface was considered aerial imagery [36,37]. Those survey altitude limits further constrained the size of stream that could be surveyed; at the upper bound of those aerial surveys, study sites were limited to streams up to 10 m wide [36].…”
Section: Uav Survey Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to the use of UAVs for canopy cover monitoring, methods were limited by the spatial extent that could be covered due to most survey elevations, as well as the cost and time needed to perform the surveys. As recently as 2017, imagery taken from a height of 2-5 m above a stream's water surface was considered aerial imagery [36,37]. Those survey altitude limits further constrained the size of stream that could be surveyed; at the upper bound of those aerial surveys, study sites were limited to streams up to 10 m wide [36].…”
Section: Uav Survey Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 1998b), vegetation cover is represented by large‐scale polygons that are characterized in terms of width, average height, and average density. Thus, these approaches provide an average shade estimate for a selected transect of vegetation that is similar to field‐based methods, which provide a channel‐scale estimate of shade cast by vegetation rather than directly assessing shading on the river surface (Clark et al. , 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%