The precision with which individual termination codons in mRNA are recognized by protein release factors (RFs) has been measured and compared with the decoding of sense codons by tRNA. An Escherichia coli system for protein synthesis in vitro with purified components was used to study the accuracy of termination by RF1 and RF2 in the presence or absence of RF3. The efficiency of factor-dependent termination at all sense codons differing from any of the three stop codons by a single mutation was measured and compared with the efficiency of termination at the three stop codons. RF1 and RF2 discriminate against sense codons related to stop codons by between 3 and more than 6 orders of magnitude. This high level of accuracy is obtained without energy-driven error correction (proofreading), in contrast to codon-dependent aminoacyl-tRNA recognition by ribosomes. Two codons, UAU and UGG, stand out as hotspots for RF-dependent premature termination.protein synthesis ͉ translational processivity ͉ premature termination S ixty-one of the 64 base triplets in the genetic code are sense codons, which are translated in bacteria to the 20 standard amino acids in proteins by about 50 aminoacyl-tRNAs. The remaining three codons usually signal termination of translation and the release of completed proteins from ribosomes by release factors RF1 and RF2. Efficient translation requires both rapid binding to their respective codons of cognate aminoacyl-tRNAs, in ternary complex with elongation factor EF-Tu and GTP, and fast termination of protein synthesis at stop signals by RFs. In addition to fast signal processing, codon translation must attain a high level of accuracy so that nonacceptable amino acid replacements in nascent proteins do not impair cell growth and viability. Similarly, misrecognition by RFs of sense codons as stop signals leads to truncated proteins, an energetically costly event, the frequency of which also must be contained.Pauling was among the first to reflect on the errors that must occur during protein synthesis because of the limited maximum differences in interaction standard free energies between different pairs of amino acids, and he concluded that amino acid substitutions theoretically should occur at frequencies in the percent range (1). Though later shown to be overly pessimistic (2), these predictions led to theoretical studies showing that enzymatic selection can, under certain conditions, be more accurate than the instrinsic selectivity of a single step.The accuracy (A) of simple enzyme selection schemes, defined as the probability of correct product formation divided by the probability of an error at equal concentrations of cognate and noncognate substrates, is limited by the standard free energy difference between the transition state leading to product formation and ground state for cognate (⌬G c ) and noncognate (⌬G nc ) substrates by the inequality. The precision of codon translation depends on differences in H-bond energies between cognate and noncognate tRNAcodon interactions, though other i...