“…To date, extensive efforts have been exploited to enhance the photocatalytic activity of g-C 3 N 4 by elements doping, defect engineering, morphology control and constructing heterostructure, etc. , Among these modification methods, a g-C 3 N 4 -based heterojunction has been considered an effective strategy to significantly improve the separation efficiency of photogenerated carriers and photocatalytic activity. Compared with the traditional type II heterojunction, Z-scheme heterojunctions show many unique advantages: (1) boosting the spatial separation efficiency of photogenerated electron–hole pairs; (2) retaining the strong redox ability for driving the PHE reaction; (3) possessing the spatially separated reductive and oxidative active sites; and (4) extended visible light harvesting. ,,− Up to now, some Z-scheme g-C 3 N 4 -based photocatalysts have been employed for improving photocatalytic performance, such as Fe 2 O 3 /g-C 3 N 4 , BWO-OV/OCN, and MnO 2 /g-C 3 N 4 . ,− However, although these systems have exhibited excellent photocatalytic activities, they still have some deficiencies, e.g., insufficient interaction interface, slow carrier separation/transfer rate, and narrow spectral response.…”