2021
DOI: 10.18844/cjes.v16i5.6347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Discourse on Innovation of English Teaching in China from the Perspective of Artificial Intelligence

Abstract: With the progression of economic globalisation, China’s expectations about the quality of English teaching in the country have increased, and because of the restrictive drawbacks of orthodox English teaching models, they cannot meet these requirements. The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) technology can create new opportunities for the optimisation of English teaching. As such, this study aims to systematically review and analyse the current research on the innovations afforded by AI for China’s Engli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While Ćalušić (2021) views the eventual widespread adoption of these technologies in the language classroom as inevitable, he cautions against the view that artificial tools alone can teach lan-guage; rather, these tools must be designed to "assist teachers, not to replace them" (p. 39). Other surveys of the usage of such tools have made similar observations, both about the value of these tools and about the continued need for a human instructor, whose role may become more that of a facilitator, stepping in as needed as students train with software (De Smedt, 2002;Ceolin et al, 2016;Xu & Margevica-Grinberga, 2021;Mukherjee, 2020). Most of the tools designed thus far are for English language training (with China in particular planning to spend billions on AI-assisted English-language instruction), but tools to teach other languages are also being developed (Pokrivčáková, 2019;Xiao & Hu, 2019;Ćalušić, 2021;Orlandi, 2021;Xu & Margevica-Grinberga, 2021;Haristiani, 2019).…”
Section: Humanities and Language Artsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…While Ćalušić (2021) views the eventual widespread adoption of these technologies in the language classroom as inevitable, he cautions against the view that artificial tools alone can teach lan-guage; rather, these tools must be designed to "assist teachers, not to replace them" (p. 39). Other surveys of the usage of such tools have made similar observations, both about the value of these tools and about the continued need for a human instructor, whose role may become more that of a facilitator, stepping in as needed as students train with software (De Smedt, 2002;Ceolin et al, 2016;Xu & Margevica-Grinberga, 2021;Mukherjee, 2020). Most of the tools designed thus far are for English language training (with China in particular planning to spend billions on AI-assisted English-language instruction), but tools to teach other languages are also being developed (Pokrivčáková, 2019;Xiao & Hu, 2019;Ćalušić, 2021;Orlandi, 2021;Xu & Margevica-Grinberga, 2021;Haristiani, 2019).…”
Section: Humanities and Language Artsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Content-based instruction (CBI) originated from Canada's Immersion Program for foreign English learners. Under CBI, language was considered as the medium to acquire new knowledge and was learned most effectively in purposeful, meaningful and social contexts [5]. CBI is widely used in language teaching settings and has been proven effective in improving students' linguistic skills, especially in communication.…”
Section: Content-based Inverted Class With the Assistance Of Aimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, several studies indicate various researches on artificial intelligence in different areas such as English education (Xu and Margeviča-Grinberga 2021), Mathematics education (Heins 2022), and discourse related to education and school context (Gocen and Aydemir 2020). In this matter, the higher education students tend to be more exposed to the newest platform and media of technology in their daily life especially for Visual Communication Design students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%