2011
DOI: 10.1080/14689367.2011.596523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A discrete dynamical system for the greedy strategy at collective Parrondo games

Abstract: We consider a collective version of Parrondo's games with probabilities parameterized by 2 (0, 1) in which a fraction 2 (0, 1] of an infinite number of players collectively choose and individually play at each turn the game that yields the maximum average profit at that turn. Dinı´s and Parrondo [L. Dinı´s and J.M.R. Parrondo, Optimal strategies in collective Parrondo games, Europhys. Lett. 63 (2003), pp. 319-325] and Van den Broeck and Cleuren [C. Van den Broeck and B. Cleuren, Parrondo games with strategy, i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also collective versions of Parrondo's games that produce paradoxical results [23,24,25,26,27,28]. More specifically, in refs.…”
Section: Parrondo's Paradox In Single and Collective Gamesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are also collective versions of Parrondo's games that produce paradoxical results [23,24,25,26,27,28]. More specifically, in refs.…”
Section: Parrondo's Paradox In Single and Collective Gamesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, game A reduces the number of times that the bad coin is used in game B, making it more profitable. There are also collective versions of Parrondo's games that produce paradoxical results [23,24,25,26,27,28]. More specifically, in refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the previous versions have focused on how to modify game B, Toral [9] proposed a modification of game A which is played by N number of players as well. Game A is modified where a player i gives away one unit of his capital to a randomly chosen player j. Ye [10] proposed a multi-agent Parrondo's model based on the network evolution and performed a study of a mechanism depending on the evolution of the network structure (the rewiring mechanism) instead of game A. Ethier [11] has considered a collective version of Parrondo's games with probabilities parametrized by ρ ∈ (0, 1] in which a fraction of an infinite number of players collectively choose and individually play at each turn the game that yields the maximum average profit at that turn. Ye [12] proposed a Parrondo's model based on complex networks, and a structure of game B applied in arbitrary topologies was constructed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%