2023
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2301.09349
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Discrete Immersed Boundary Method for the numerical simulation of heat transfer in compressible flows

Abstract: In the present study, a discrete forcing Immersed Boundary Method (IBM) is proposed for the numerical simulation of high-speed flow problems including heat exchange. The flow field is governed by the compressible Navier-Stokes equations, which are resolved by using the open source library OpenFOAM. The numerical solver is modified to include source terms in the momentum equation and in the energy equation, which account for the presence of the immersed body. The method is validated on some benchmark test cases… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Mach number (x-z plane) and the temperature (x-y plane) fields are depicted in Figure 21b. The drag coefficient C d , the recirculation length L, the separation angle θ s and the shock stand-off distance ∆ s are presented in Table 11 and show a good agreement with the results of Nagata et al [63] and Riahi et al [64]. Since the Nusselt number is highly dependent on the mesh size, smaller differences between the present Nusselt number and the one found by Nagata et al [63] may be expected by using a finer computational grid.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Mach number (x-z plane) and the temperature (x-y plane) fields are depicted in Figure 21b. The drag coefficient C d , the recirculation length L, the separation angle θ s and the shock stand-off distance ∆ s are presented in Table 11 and show a good agreement with the results of Nagata et al [63] and Riahi et al [64]. Since the Nusselt number is highly dependent on the mesh size, smaller differences between the present Nusselt number and the one found by Nagata et al [63] may be expected by using a finer computational grid.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Nagata et al[63] 1.44 0.29 154 0.22 3.5 Riahi et al[64] ) 1.48 0.28 156 0.23 4.0 Supersonic flow past a heated sphere, M∞ = 2 , Re∞ = 300 (Tw = 2T∞): drag coefficient C d , recirculation length L, separation angle θs, shock stand-off distance ∆s and average Nusselt number N u.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%