2011
DOI: 10.1109/jssc.2011.2164011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Distributed Oscillator Based All-Digital PLL With a 32-Phase Embedded Phase-to-Digital Converter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 in which the largest spur level is at 470 kHz offset and the closest spur is 230 kHz (470 kHz/2). The sub harmonic and harmonic spurs can be originated from a DCO quantization, a TDC quantization, an intermodulation related to the amount of inherent jitter, and a parasitic coupling of CKR-controlled switching in many digital gates sharing the same substrate, power and ground planes with DCO [5], [8], [20], [21]. The ADPLL phase noise curves measured using Agilent E5052B signal source analyzer are plotted like in Fig.…”
Section: Whenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…20 in which the largest spur level is at 470 kHz offset and the closest spur is 230 kHz (470 kHz/2). The sub harmonic and harmonic spurs can be originated from a DCO quantization, a TDC quantization, an intermodulation related to the amount of inherent jitter, and a parasitic coupling of CKR-controlled switching in many digital gates sharing the same substrate, power and ground planes with DCO [5], [8], [20], [21]. The ADPLL phase noise curves measured using Agilent E5052B signal source analyzer are plotted like in Fig.…”
Section: Whenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22. The effective TDC resolution of (11) can be derived from the measured in-band phase noise [5], [19].…”
Section: Whenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in practice, quantization errors introduced by the fractional divider (FDIV), TDC, and DAC degrade digital FNPLL performance. As a result, jitter performance of digital FNPLLs, especially those using ring oscillators, is grossly inferior to their analog counterparts [1], [8]- [12]. Ring oscillators are extremely low-cost, scalable, and can inherently provide multiple phases with a wide tuning range.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The closed-loop transfer function of the system takes the general form shown in The all-digital implementation of the PLL is advantageous because it allows the system to be more easily integrated with other digital components on an IC by eliminating the need for analog subsystems such as the charge pump and the RC loop filter which may require off-chip resistors and capacitors [3], [14]. Since this is now a digital system, a reference clock signal is required for synchronously clocking the digital components.…”
Section: Conventional Analog Pllmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A DCO uses an array of digital inputs to control a bank of binary-and unit-weighted switchable capacitors, or varactors, of varying sizes [2], [14], [15], [16]. Because of the digital nature of the tuning varactor bank, the DCO has a finite minimum step size determined by the size of the smallest varactors.…”
Section: Conventional Analog Pllmentioning
confidence: 99%