2000
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.275.14.10453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Dominant Negative Fas-associated Death Domain Protein Mutant Inhibits Proliferation and Leads to Impaired Calcium Mobilization in Both T-cells and Fibroblasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
5
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…T-cell compartment. 26 The influence of such a FADD-dependent signaling pathway on proliferation is not restricted to T cells 31,32 and supports further data linking nonapoptotic death receptor signaling to proliferation. ( 33,34 and references therein).…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…T-cell compartment. 26 The influence of such a FADD-dependent signaling pathway on proliferation is not restricted to T cells 31,32 and supports further data linking nonapoptotic death receptor signaling to proliferation. ( 33,34 and references therein).…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…Cell concentration was estimated as in Figure 1 towards TRAIL tested so far showed additional proliferation by treatment with TRAIL (data not shown). As FADD might signal proliferation (Hueber et al, 2000), JURKAT cells expressing the dominant-negative form of FADD were included, which also showed TRAILmediated proliferation to 113% within 24 h (data not shown), suggesting that neither Caspase-8 nor FADD are involved in TRAIL-mediated proliferation. Thus, inhibition of apoptosis by disruption of receptor proximal signaling may allow TRAIL-induced survival and proliferation.…”
Section: Trail-induced Proliferation In Cancer Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, peripheral Tcells and immature T-cell progenitors that lack FADD (Zhang et al, 1998(Zhang et al, , 2001 or overexpress the dominantnegative FADD mutant protein (Newton et al, 1998;Walsh et al, 1998Walsh et al, , 2000Zornig et al, 1998) display defective proliferation in vivo. In vitro studies using fibroblasts (Hueber et al, 2000), myeloid progenitors (Pellegrini et al, 2005), or breast epithelial cells (Alappat et al, 2003) have yielded similar results. The mechanisms through which FADD acts to induce cell proliferation rather than apoptosis are not well-understood, but may be related to its subcellular distribution and/or phosphorylation (O'Reilly et al, 2004;Zhang et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%