A dot that went for a walk: People prefer lines drawn with human‐like kinematics

Abstract

A dominant theory of embodied aesthetic experience (Freedberg & Gallese, 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 197) posits that the appreciation of visual art is linked to the artist's movements when creating the artwork, yet a direct link between the kinematics of drawing actions and the aesthetics of drawing outcomes has not been experimentally demonstrated. Across four experiments, we measured aesthetic responses of students from arts and non-arts backgrounds to drawing movements generated from computational models of human writing. Experiment 1 demonstrated that human-like drawing movements with bell-shaped velocity profiles (Sigma Lognormal [SL] and Minimum Jerk [MJ]) are perceived as more natural and pleasant than movements with a uniform profile, and in both Experiments 1 and 2 movements that were perceived as more natural were also preferred. Experiment 3 showed that this effect persists if lower-level dynamic stimulus features are fully matched across experimental and control conditions. Furthermore, aesthetic preference for human-like movements were associated with greater perceptual fluency in Experiment 3, evidenced by unbiased estimations of the duration of natural movements. In Experiment 4, line drawings with visual features consistent with the dynamics of natural, human-like movements were preferred, but only by art students. Our findings directly link the aesthetics of human action to the visual aesthetics of drawings, but highlight the importance of incorporating artistic expertise into embodied accounts of aesthetic experience.This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Social robots as depictions of social agents

“…In our own research, we have shown that movements that comply with the kinematics of human action are judged to be more natural and aesthetically pleasing than movements that violate human kinematics (Chamberlain et al, 2022). In the case of dance, greater predictability of movement kinematics increases aesthetic preference.…”

Preferences need inferences: Learning, valuation, and curiosity in aesthetic experience

“…Brielmann & Dayan, n.d.). This pleasantness of "generative success" can get quite literal: Chamberlain et al (2021) showed that drawings created by natural, human-like movement dynamics are preferred, at least by viewers with drawing experience (and thus the necessary generative models). In a similar vein, we tend to prefer stimuli with the same low-level statistical regularities (e.g.…”

Dancing robots: Social interactions are performed, not depicted

“…In our own research, we have shown that movements that comply with the kinematics of human action are judged to be more natural and aesthetically pleasing than movements that violate human kinematics (Chamberlain et al, 2022). In the case of dance, greater predictability of movement kinematics increases aesthetic preference.…”