Purpose:One invariable hallmark of severe sepsis is generalized tissue "malperfusion" and hyperpermeability secondary to microcirculatory/capillary leakage. This review focuses on direct and/or indirect influences of norepinephrine, as a standard of care, and vasopressin, as an alternative vasoactive drug, on organ and tissue perfusion/permeability in severe sepsis.Source: English and French language articles and books published between 1966 and 2005 were identified through a computerized Medline search using the terms "sepsis, permeability, norepinephrine and vasopressin". Relevant publications were retrieved and scanned for additional sources.
Principal findings:There are few randomized clinical trials comparing different vasopressors in sepsis; most available literature consists of clinical reports, animal experiments and occasional reviews. Based on the best current evidence from these sources, we describe the status of major organ perfusion/ permeability in sepsis (i.e., the lung, the kidney, the heart, the intestine/gut) in the context of sepsis-induced organ dysfunction/failure. Potential and differential therapeutic effects of the vasopressors norepinephrine and arginine-vasopressin, in the setting of sepsis, are identified.
Conclusions:In the treatment of sepsis, arginine-vasopressin exhibits organ-specific heterogeneity in vascular responsiveness, compared to norepinephrine. While norepinephrine is a current standard of care in sepsis, arginine-vasopressin shows promise for the treatment of septic shock.
Objectif