2020
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dual‐bending endoscope with shape‐lockable hydraulic actuation and water‐jet propulsion for gastrointestinal tract screening

Abstract: Background Traditional flexible endoscopes are sophisticated medical devices that require frequent and expensive maintenance. Therefore, their implementation within low‐income and rural regions is challenging due to their high cost, complex sterilization process and poor portability. Aims This paper aims to develop an endoscopic platform that is low‐cost, disposable and portable, with the primary goal of reducing gastric cancer‐related mortality among low‐ and middle‐income communities through wider access to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, they often represent simpler fabrication and assembly with respect to rigid robots with joints; being molded in monolithic material designs (Chandler et al, 2020), with embedded strain limiting materials (Mosadegh et al, 2014;Polygerinos et al, 2015) or with the addition of functional components (e.g., magnetic particles) (Kim et al, 2019;Lloyd et al, 2019). These advantages are afforded due to the highly compliant nature of the materials from which they are typically made, and have made soft robots (SRs) a popular choice for small-scale medical and surgical instrumentation (Cianchetti et al, 2014(Cianchetti et al, , 2018da Veiga et al, 2020); from common grasping tasks (Zhang et al, 2017b), endoscopic (Chauhan et al, 2021;Liu et al, 2021) and minimally invasive surgery (Edelmann et al, 2017;Oliver-Butler et al, 2017;Jeon et al, 2019) to microfluidic platforms in order to stimulate and sort cells (Zhang et al, 2017c;Onaizah et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, they often represent simpler fabrication and assembly with respect to rigid robots with joints; being molded in monolithic material designs (Chandler et al, 2020), with embedded strain limiting materials (Mosadegh et al, 2014;Polygerinos et al, 2015) or with the addition of functional components (e.g., magnetic particles) (Kim et al, 2019;Lloyd et al, 2019). These advantages are afforded due to the highly compliant nature of the materials from which they are typically made, and have made soft robots (SRs) a popular choice for small-scale medical and surgical instrumentation (Cianchetti et al, 2014(Cianchetti et al, , 2018da Veiga et al, 2020); from common grasping tasks (Zhang et al, 2017b), endoscopic (Chauhan et al, 2021;Liu et al, 2021) and minimally invasive surgery (Edelmann et al, 2017;Oliver-Butler et al, 2017;Jeon et al, 2019) to microfluidic platforms in order to stimulate and sort cells (Zhang et al, 2017c;Onaizah et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the small cross-section of the robot, the high pressure in the transmission tube may pose a safety problem Intervention is relatively strong [9][10][11] Electromechanical Power supply limits robots' long-distance inspection [12][13][14][15] Hybrid The complexity of the internal actuation mechanism leads to cumbersome design and prevents significant cost reduction [16][17] There are two types of magnetic field generation: permanent magnets and electromagnetics. The earliest medical use of permanent magnets for remote manipulation was the removal of metal fragments and shrapnel from human body parts.…”
Section: Pneumatic or Hydraulicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different actuation methods and power sources have been studied for this purpose, for example, pneumatic or hydraulic [9][10][11] , electromechanical [12][13][14][15] , hybrid [16][17] , and magnetic methods [18][19] . However, compared to magnetic actuation (Tab.…”
Section: Introduction1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Actuators for endoscopes. ( a ), schematic illustration of the fluid line in a wired endoscope kit [ 110 ]; ( b ), an endoscope equipped with soft pop-up arms [ 44 , 48 ]; ( c ), pneumatically inflated actuation of intracranial endoscope [ 92 ]; ( d ), a magnetic soft vacuum sucker to remove surgery patch in stomach [ 106 ]; ( e ), X-ray navigation of magnetic actuators under skin [ 102 ]. All images are reproduced or adapted with permission.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%