2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dual-porosity model for evaluating petroleum resource potential in unconventional tight-shale plays with application to Utica Shale, Quebec (Canada)

Abstract: Unconventional tight to shale reservoirs vary from tight sandstone/siltstone to organic-rich mudstone/shale, commonly with mixed lithologies. In such reservoir systems, matrix pores and organic pores with different origins and distinct physical and chemical properties co-exist for hydrocarbon storage. Traditional resource assessment methods, designed for conventional reservoirs, cannot handle the two pore systems properly. This study proposes a dual-porosity model to respond to the need for a new method in ass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ordos shale belongs to transitional shale. The sample TRA-10 is an example of Early Silurian Utica shale from Appalachian Basin in the U.S. Utica shale is one of the most important gas-producing formations in North America [43,53,[71][72][73]. A sample from Xiuwu Basin is characterized as an overmature marine shale deposit at the Ordovician time period [74].…”
Section: Samples and Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ordos shale belongs to transitional shale. The sample TRA-10 is an example of Early Silurian Utica shale from Appalachian Basin in the U.S. Utica shale is one of the most important gas-producing formations in North America [43,53,[71][72][73]. A sample from Xiuwu Basin is characterized as an overmature marine shale deposit at the Ordovician time period [74].…”
Section: Samples and Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated in Table , the bulk porosities of the MES shales range from 4.29 to 7.41% with an average of 5.61%. The oil saturation ranges from 9.35–36.09%, with a mean of 15.59%, which is higher than that in the Dongying Sag with an oil saturation of 1–8% . The pores could be divided into micropores (<2 nm), mesopores (2–50 nm), and macropores (>50 nm) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The CMG's GEM simulator [26] was employed to simulate the base reservoir simulation case (reservoir depth = 2057.40 m, reservoir pressure = 22,063 kpa, reservoir temperature = 96.11 • C, matrix porosity = 0.05, matrix permeability = 0.00023 md, and initial gas saturation = 0.7). The amount of (monolayer) gas adsorbed in organic-rich shales was defined by the Langmuir equation [27], and has recently been applied in other shale gas researches [28][29][30]. Langmuir isotherm data for the Barnett shale are Langmuir volume of 3.54 scm/ton, Langmuir pressure of 8618 kpa, and rock density of 2.50 g/cm 3 [23][24][25].…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%